Epidemiology of sepsis and septic shock in intensive care units between sepsis-2 and sepsis-3 populations: sepsis prognostication in intensive care unit and emergency room (SPICE-ICU)

Abstract

Background Diagnosing sepsis remains difficult because it is not a single disease but a syndrome with various pathogen- and host factor-associated symptoms. Sepsis-3 was established to improve risk stratification among patients with infection based on organ failures, but it has been still controversial compared with previous definitions. Therefore, we aimed to describe characteristics of patients who met sepsis-2 (severe sepsis) and sepsis-3 definitions. Methods This was a multicenter, prospective cohort study conducted by 22 intensive care units (ICUs) in Japan. Adult patients (≥ 16 years) with newly suspected infection from December 2017 to May 2018 were included. Those without infection at final diagnosis were excluded. Patient’s characteristics and outcomes were described according to whether they met each definition or not. Results In total, 618 patients with suspected infection were admitted to 22 ICUs during the study, of whom 530 (85.8%) met the sepsis-2 definition and 569 (92.1%) met the sepsis-3 definition. The two groups comprised different individuals, and 501 (81.1%) patients met both definitions. In-hospital mortality of study population was 19.1%. In-hospital mortality among patients with sepsis-2 and sepsis-3 patients was comparable (21.7% and 19.8%, respectively). Patients exclusively identified with sepsis-2 or sepsis-3 had a lower mortality (17.2% vs. 4.4%, respectively). No patients died if they did not meet any definitions. Patients who met sepsis-3 shock definition had higher in-hospital mortality than those who met sepsis-2 shock definition. Conclusions Most patients with infection admitted to ICU meet sepsis-2 and sepsis-3 criteria. However, in-hospital mortality did not occur if patients did not meet any criteria. Better criteria might be developed by better selection and combination of elements in both definitions. Trial registration UMIN000027452

Association between comorbid asthma and prognosis of critically ill patients with severe sepsis: a cohort study

“…Sepsis is a clinical syndrome with physiologic, biologic, and biochemical abnormalities caused by a dysregulated host response to infection, which leads to life-threatening organ dysfunction 13 . About 30% of patients admitted to general intensive care units (ICUs) and about 80% of ICU patients with infection were found to meet the criteria of sepsis 14 , 15 , although the results might differ when different criteria were used. The management of sepsis is still challenging, with a mortality rate ranging from 10 to 50% 16 – 18 .…”

The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: research priorities for the administration, epidemiology, scoring and identification of sepsis

“…Applying different sepsis definitions leads to variable assessments of sepsis epidemiology. For example, while overlap is quite high [51], Sepsis-2 definitions [52,53] identify some patients not identified when Sepsis-3 [54] criteria are applied, and vice-versa. Similarly, different data sources affect estimates of the incidence and mortality [55].…”

“…Sepsis-2 defines septic shock as "a state of acute circulatory failure characterized by persistent arterial hypotension unexplained by other causes". The key criterion is hypotension "unexplained by other causes" [53]. Importantly, these "definitions" are really clinical criteria by which septic shock in patients might be recognized.…”

Characteristics and outcomes of frail patients with suspected infection in intensive care units: a descriptive analysis from a multicenter cohort study

“…Data were collected by the SPICU ICU investigators as part of the routine clinical workup. Data collection methods have been described in a previous study [23]; the investigators entered data into an online standardized template. Patient information included demographic characteristics, admission source, comorbidities, frailty, sites of infection, sepsis-related severity scores including the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, and laboratory data.…”