Sarcoidosis 2005
DOI: 10.1183/1025448x.00032002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epidemiology of sarcoidosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although possible at all ages, higher occurrence is observed between 25 and 40 years in both genders, at least in Scandinavian countries and Japan, and a second peak of incidence has been reported in women over 50 years of age in some published studies. The incidence of sarcoidosis is remarkably low before 15 years (1/100,000) and extremely rare before 4 years of age (0.06/100,000) (10,11). The clinical expression and severity of sarcoidosis depend on epidemiological factors.…”
Section: Epidemiologymentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although possible at all ages, higher occurrence is observed between 25 and 40 years in both genders, at least in Scandinavian countries and Japan, and a second peak of incidence has been reported in women over 50 years of age in some published studies. The incidence of sarcoidosis is remarkably low before 15 years (1/100,000) and extremely rare before 4 years of age (0.06/100,000) (10,11). The clinical expression and severity of sarcoidosis depend on epidemiological factors.…”
Section: Epidemiologymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In blacks, the disease is more likely to be disseminated, showing a higher frequency of ophthalmological, cutaneous, hepatic and lymphatic localisations, and its course in undeniably more severe. [7,10,11].…”
Section: Epidemiologymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Proportions per 100,000 population ranged from 0.1 to 64 [14][15][16]. Available individual country prevalences were used for the UK [17], Israel [18], Iceland [19], Spain (pulmonary sarcoidosis only) [20], Greece [21], Switzerland [22], Japan [23] and the USA [24].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous aetiological agents have been incriminated, both infective and noninfective [3]. Noninfective agents have been implicated because of their epidemiological association [4], but these implications have not stood the test of time [5]. Currently, the focus is on infective agents, and the two strongest contenders are Propionibacterium and Mycobacterium [6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%