2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.03.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epidemiology of penetrating injuries in the United Kingdom: A systematic review

Abstract: Our ambiguous results indicate the need for further work directed towards the epidemiology of penetrating injuries within regional trauma networks.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
13
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are consistent with and extend previous research demonstrating the most pronounced increase in death by assault for men aged 15–44 years in Scotland from 1980 to 2005, and the persistently higher rates for men and in more deprived areas 11 21. This is very similar to the sociodemographic patterning of penetrating injuries found across the UK 22…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our results are consistent with and extend previous research demonstrating the most pronounced increase in death by assault for men aged 15–44 years in Scotland from 1980 to 2005, and the persistently higher rates for men and in more deprived areas 11 21. This is very similar to the sociodemographic patterning of penetrating injuries found across the UK 22…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…From our data we clearly had an increasing trend of firearm injury admissions in recent years. The majority of patients were young males which has previously been reported [3,6,[12][13][14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…There is evidence that there may be demographic characteristics within different cohorts of penetrating injury patients based on aetiology. 1 , 8 , 9 , 10 This is important for our current findings, in that the proportional reduction in the number of cases attributable to IPV must be analysed to see how this translates into changes within the DSH group, for example.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%