2000
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.38.2.905-909.2000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epidemiology of Glycopeptide-Resistant Enterococci Colonizing High-Risk Patients in Hospitals in Johannesburg, Republic of South Africa

Abstract: Recent cases of infections caused by glycopeptide-resistant enterococci (GRE) have highlighted the emergence of these organisms in the Republic of South Africa. During May 1998 we conducted a prevalence study in four hospitals in Johannesburg and obtained 184 rectal swabs from patients identified as being at high risk for GRE colonization. Twenty enterococcal isolates showing various glycopeptide resistance genotypes were recovered: 3 Enterococcus faecium vanAisolates, 10 E. faecium vanB isolates, 6 E. gallina… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
1
7

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
12
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Using classical methods, isolates of this clone were initially identified as E. avium ; however, the VITEK 2 system and the MLSA molecular approach [17] both classified the isolates unequivocally as E. raffinosus . Since E. avium has been associated more often with human infection, and has been reported to be vancomycin‐resistant more frequently than has E. raffinosus [28–33], there was a possibility of misidentification of these two species. Wilke et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using classical methods, isolates of this clone were initially identified as E. avium ; however, the VITEK 2 system and the MLSA molecular approach [17] both classified the isolates unequivocally as E. raffinosus . Since E. avium has been associated more often with human infection, and has been reported to be vancomycin‐resistant more frequently than has E. raffinosus [28–33], there was a possibility of misidentification of these two species. Wilke et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While to date approximately 90% of E. faecium from healthcare-associated infections in the United States are resistant to ampicillin and 80% to vancomycin, these resistance percentages are significantly lower in E. faecalis ($4% resistance to ampicillin and 7% resistance to vancomycin) (Hidron et al, 2008). Also, globally, the epidemiology of VRE is dominated by E. faecium with vancomycin-resistant E. faecium being isolated from all continents (von Gottberg et al, 2000;Padiglione et al, 2003;Lee et al, 2004;Tenover & McDonald, 2005;Camargo et al, 2006;Dahl et al, 2007;Zheng et al, 2007;Hoshuyama et al, 2008;Werner et al, 2008).…”
Section: Vancomycin Resistance: a Serious Threatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the initial descriptions, VRE (predominantly the vanA phenotype) have emerged as important nosocomial pathogens worldwide [1,12–23]. The first VRE outbreaks in US hospitals often resulted from dissemination of a single strain, especially in ICUs and nephrology wards [24–26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%