Epidemiology of glenohumeral dislocation and subsequent instability in an urban population

Shields, David; Jefferies, James G.; Brooksbank, Andrew; Millar, Neal L.; Jenkins, Paul J.

doi:10.1016/j.jse.2017.09.006

Cited by 60 publications

(45 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Anterior dislocations are by far the most common type (97% of all glenohumeral-joint dislocations). 10 Reduction of posterior or inferior dislocations is contraindicated because these are associated with more complications and often cannot be reduced without general anesthesia. 6 An additional contraindication is a possible fracture of any associated bone (humerus, clavicle, or scapula; Table 2).…”

Section: Reducing Glenohumeral-joint Dislocations Indications Contramentioning

confidence: 99%

Closed-Reduction Techniques for Glenohumeral-, Patellofemoral-, and Interphalangeal-Joint Dislocations

Wright

Brandon

Reisman

2020

Journal of Athletic Training

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Joint dislocations account for a small but important portion of all athletic injuries, with most occurring at the glenohumeral, patellofemoral, and interphalangeal joints. Athletic trainers are responsible for managing acute joint-dislocation injuries, which may include performing closed-reduction techniques when appropriate. To achieve optimal patient outcomes, the clinician should be formally trained and skilled in performing various techniques and familiar with the evidence supporting the selection of each technique. In this clinical review, we outline general reduction procedures and then summarize and synthesize the existing literature on common closed-reduction techniques for glenohumeral-, patellofemoral-, and interphalangeal-joint dislocations. When appropriate, the content has been adapted to be specific to the athletic trainer's scope of practice.

show abstract

Section: Reducing Glenohumeral-joint Dislocations Indications Contramentioning

confidence: 99%

Closed-Reduction Techniques for Glenohumeral-, Patellofemoral-, and Interphalangeal-Joint Dislocations

Wright

Brandon

Reisman

2020

Journal of Athletic Training

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Gender does not seem to predispose to glenohumeral instability. Our patient was eighty years old, but she had never had a shoulder dislocation in the past and the mechanism of injury was low energy compared to others with associated vascular injury [15].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Axillo-subclavian dissection and pseudoaneurysm following inferior glenohumeral dislocation: Case report and literature review

Elkbuli

Ehrhardt

McKenney

et al. 2020

International Journal of Surgery Case Reports

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It has been reported that the incidence of glenohumeral joint dislocation in the general population is 2-8% [1,2]. In the developed countries, the prevalence of glenohumeral dislocation is reportedly 21.9-23.9/100.000, with the majority reported as anterior [3,4]. Falling and sports injuries are among the common causes of glenohumeral dislocations that affect young men more often [4].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

No Sedation, No Traction, and No Need for Assistance: Analysis of New Prakash’s Method of Shoulder Reduction

Kuru

Olçar

Bilge

et al. 2020

Emergency Medicine International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and Objective. Shoulder dislocations, which often occur anterior, account for about half of all dislocations. There are numerous reduction methods reported for the conservative treatment of acute anterior dislocations. However, there is still an ongoing search for an optimal method given the procedure time, possible complications, success rates, and need for sedation/analgesia in existing methods. This study seeks to explore the effectiveness and safety of Prakash’s method in the treatment of acute shoulder dislocations, which is a novel method in the treatment of anterior shoulder dislocations. Materials and Methods. A total of 19 patients who were admitted to the emergency department with the diagnosis of anterior shoulder dislocation participated in this study. The diagnosis of shoulder dislocation was established in the emergency department with physical examination and anteroposterior shoulder radiography. The method was applied only once to the patients in the sitting position by the same physician without using any help, traction, anesthesia, analgesia, and myorelaxant. Results. The mean age of the patients was 37.3 ± 13.1 years. Among them, 36.8% n=7 were female and 63.2% n=12 were male. Recurrent dislocations were observed in 21.1% n=4 of the patients. The success rate of the method was 94.7% n=18. No complication was noted in the patients. The mean procedure time was 243 ± 38 seconds. Conclusion. Prakash’s method is a safe method for anterior shoulder dislocations that can be quickly performed with no need for sedation, assistance, and traction and has a high success rate.

show abstract

Epidemiology of glenohumeral dislocation and subsequent instability in an urban population

Cited by 60 publications

References 23 publications

Closed-Reduction Techniques for Glenohumeral-, Patellofemoral-, and Interphalangeal-Joint Dislocations

Closed-Reduction Techniques for Glenohumeral-, Patellofemoral-, and Interphalangeal-Joint Dislocations

Axillo-subclavian dissection and pseudoaneurysm following inferior glenohumeral dislocation: Case report and literature review

No Sedation, No Traction, and No Need for Assistance: Analysis of New Prakash’s Method of Shoulder Reduction

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About