2017
DOI: 10.14744/ejmo.2017.21939
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epidemiology and Susceptibility Patterns of Hospital-Acquired Conjunctivitis in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current study, we found that 66% of neonatal HAC cases were caused by Gram-negative bacteria, and this difference was attributed to the application of the CDC guidelines to define neonatal HAC [ 9 ]. Our findings are in line with various reports from India [ 8 ], Turkey [ 7 ], and Portugal [ 13 ] ( Table 4 ). The findings from these studies reported 60% to 70% of cases as having a Gram-negative bacterial etiology of HAC.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In the current study, we found that 66% of neonatal HAC cases were caused by Gram-negative bacteria, and this difference was attributed to the application of the CDC guidelines to define neonatal HAC [ 9 ]. Our findings are in line with various reports from India [ 8 ], Turkey [ 7 ], and Portugal [ 13 ] ( Table 4 ). The findings from these studies reported 60% to 70% of cases as having a Gram-negative bacterial etiology of HAC.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…These bacteria have been usually described as causative agents for HAI in general, and HAC specifically. This result is similar to a Turkish report, in which they observed that Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Klebsiella pneumoniae , and Escherichia coli were the most common causes of bacterial HAC in neonates and accounted for 60% of all reported cases [ 7 ]. Likewise, Dias et al found that these three bacteria were responsible for about 50% of reported bacterial HAC cases in neonates [ 13 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Whether considered colonization or active infection, the pathogens isolated could serve as a potential source of sepsis or bacteremia in vulnerable preterm and low birth weight infants, particularly those on non-invasive ventilation, and may also result in life-threatening systemic infections. Many of these hospitalacquired bacteria, such as Escherichia coli (E. coli), are invasive pathogens resistant to antimicrobials (1,2,(4)(5)(6)(7)(8). As a result, some studies recommend collecting conjunctival samples for surveillance culture studies in the NICU to eradicate these pathogens and prevent sepsis or horizontal transmission of infection (9).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%