(DC Muller) Word count (main report): 8861,284
Word count (abstract): 186Take home message: Differences in cancer incidence between men and women are commonly attributed to different exposure to risk factors. This is unlikely to explain the observed sex ratio for kidney cancer, which is constant across age, time period, and geographical region.
1
AbstractIt is well established that men are at higher risk of most non sex-specific cancers than women, but there has been surprisingly little research investigating these differences. This is possibly because differences in exposure to established risk factors and hypothesized protection by female sex hormones are thought to account for the totality of the sex differences. These explanations remain somewhat speculative, as the magnitude of the sex ratio in cancer incidence has not been systematically studied, with no quantitative estimate of the variability of the sex ratio across countries, age groups, and periods of diagnosis. We analyzed analysed worldwide cancer incidence data for the years 1978 to 2007 in terms of sex-disparities, and explicitly quantified the variability in sex disparities by age, year, and geographical region. Our analysis highlights several cancer types for which suspected and commonly accepted factors are unlikely to fully explain the observed sex disparity. In particular, kidney cancer showed a 2 male cases for 1 female case incidence ratio that was constant by age, year, and region, suggesting that other factors than socio-cultural habits and health behaviours are responsible for this sex disparity.Patient summary: We quantified the difference in the incidence of various cancer types between men and women over thirty years across the world. While the trends for some cancers such as lung cancer clearly correlate with known variations in lifestyle habits, we found that the observed sex disparity for others like kidney cancer is unlikely to be explained by known risk factors.
2
Main reportDifferences in cancer incidence rates between men and women have been widely reported. 1,2 Men are at higher risk of most non sex-specific cancers, with the rare exceptions of thyroid and gallbladder cancers. There has been surprisingly little research investigating these differences. This is possibly because differences in exposure to established risk factors and hypothesized protection by female sex hormones are thought to account for the totality of the sex differences.These explanations remain somewhat speculative, as the magnitude of the sex ratio in cancer incidence has not been systematically studied, with previous reports providing no quantitative estimate of the variability of the sex ratio across countries, age groups, and periods of diagnosis.On kidney cancer incidence, interpretation of stratified estimates has been contradictory with the male predominance deemed as either "unresolved" 2 or "partly explained by established environmental risk factors" 1 . Such aA systematic evaluation of the variability could uncover patterns in sex-specific inc...