2020
DOI: 10.3345/cep.2020.00535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epidemiology and clinical features of coronavirus disease 2019 in children

Abstract: Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), which started in Wuhan, China, in December 2019 and declared a worldwide pandemic on March 11, 2020, is a novel infectious disease that causes respiratory illness and death. Pediatric COVID-19 accounts for a small percentage of patients and is often milder than that in adults; however, it can progress to severe disease in some cases. Even neonates can suffer from COVID-19, and children may spread the disease in the community. This review summarizes what is currently known a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

14
140
3
15

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(172 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(32 reference statements)
14
140
3
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Discussion | Although this report is limited by small numbers, the data show that (1) the overall morbidity of COVID-19 in pediatric patients with cancer is low with only 5% requiring hospitalization for symptoms of COVID-19; (2) that the rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection among asymptomatic pediatric patients is very low; (3) that unrecognized SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic caregivers is a major infection control consideration; and (4) that consistent with the sex difference previously seen in adults with critical disease, 5 there is a male bias in SARS-CoV-2 infections in children, suggesting a biological basis in skewed infectivity. This report suggests that pediatric patients with cancer may not be more vulnerable than other children [2][3][4] to infection or morbidity resulting from SARS-CoV-2. Although the asymptomatic SARS-CoV carrier rate in children in the general population is not known, our testing of 120 asymptomatic pediatric patients with cancer revealed only a 2.5% rate of SARS-CoV-2 positivity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Discussion | Although this report is limited by small numbers, the data show that (1) the overall morbidity of COVID-19 in pediatric patients with cancer is low with only 5% requiring hospitalization for symptoms of COVID-19; (2) that the rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection among asymptomatic pediatric patients is very low; (3) that unrecognized SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic caregivers is a major infection control consideration; and (4) that consistent with the sex difference previously seen in adults with critical disease, 5 there is a male bias in SARS-CoV-2 infections in children, suggesting a biological basis in skewed infectivity. This report suggests that pediatric patients with cancer may not be more vulnerable than other children [2][3][4] to infection or morbidity resulting from SARS-CoV-2. Although the asymptomatic SARS-CoV carrier rate in children in the general population is not known, our testing of 120 asymptomatic pediatric patients with cancer revealed only a 2.5% rate of SARS-CoV-2 positivity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Data on the prevalence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in children, [1][2][3][4] and in children with cancer specifically have been limited. Less than 1% of cases reported from China were in children younger than 10 years.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that pediatric cases are generally identified at that time in a familial cluster or and generally are infected by one sick parent or family member. According to a study, 71.2% (183/257) of infected children were reported having a household contact [29]. In another study by Lu, 90.1% of patients were reported to be with family clusters [30].…”
Section: Epidemiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After removing duplicates, the first search yielded eight systematic reviews [5,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. Three of them were eliminated because they did include information on clinical characteristics in children [7][8][9].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three of them were eliminated because they did include information on clinical characteristics in children [7][8][9]. Therefore, we evaluated five systematic reviews done at different periods during the pandemic and thus including somewhat different primary studies [10][11][12][13] [13] included 45 studies from China (the total number of patients was not described) up to March 19, 2020. And Streng et al [14] included 8 studies from China (ranging from 6 to 2,143 patients) and one survey from Germany (33 patients) in hospitalized children, up to March 31, 2020.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%