Epidemiology

Sturmey, Peter

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-17569-0_2

Cited by 4 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This supports the results of a cross-sectional study that showed that patients with self-reported history of restraint have significantly higher dental fear compared with those who had no such experience (Aarvik et al 2022 ). Further, Sturmey reported that fearful patients have a higher risk of being restrained (Sturmey 2015 ). Many patients were described in their dental records as uncooperative, reluctant, or unwilling to receive treatment.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The identified discrepancy between patient-self-reports and dental records can be problematic because being subjected to restraint can cause psychological, social, and developmental burdens for a child (Amos 2004 ; Diseth 2006 ; Sturmey 2015 ). Sparsely written dental records regarding behavioural objectives may be the reason for this discrepancy.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Patient-self-reported history of restraint among 17-year-olds: a retrospective study of records by non-specialist dentists in the public dental service in Hordaland, Norway

Aarvik

Svendsen

Agdal

2022

Eur Arch Paediatr Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The primary purposes were to examine dental records of Norwegian adolescents’ with and without self-reported history of restraint for information about oral health (DMFT), total scheduled time in the Public Dental Service (PDS) (dental appointments, cancelled and missed appointments), and reluctant behaviour and/or dental fear and anxiety (DFA). Another purpose was to explore their dental records for information recorded by the dentist concerning the use of restraint. Methods Data on patient-self-reported history of restraint and DFA were collected in a population-based cross-sectional survey of 17-year-olds in the PDS in Hordaland, Norway, 2019. Patients were divided into two groups: self-reported restraint group (N1 = 26) and self-reported non-restraint group (N2 = 200). Data on oral health and dental treatment, total scheduled time of the PDS, reluctant behaviour or DFA, and information on the use of restraint were extracted from the dental records written by non-specialist dentists using a pre-set protocol covering the period from 2002 to 2019. Results A total of 206 dental records were analysed. Adolescents with self-reported history of restraint (n1 = 18) had higher DMFT and greater descriptions of reluctant behaviour and/or DFA, and total scheduled time compared with the self-reported non-restraint group (n2 = 188). The use of restraint was recorded in the dental records of one patient from the self-reported restraint group and in two patients from the self-reported non-restraint group. Conclusions The adolescents with self-reported history of restraint had higher DMFT, higher scheduled time attending the PDS, and had more descriptions of reluctant behaviour and/or signs of DFA compared with the self-reported non-restraint group. The patient records contained limited information concerning restraint, and there were significant discrepancies between patient-self-reported history of restraint and the recording of restraint by the dentist in the patients’ records.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Patient-self-reported history of restraint among 17-year-olds: a retrospective study of records by non-specialist dentists in the public dental service in Hordaland, Norway

Aarvik

Svendsen

Agdal

2022

Eur Arch Paediatr Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Though the field has come so far, and there has been action induced from across multiple disciplines, and the Global Alliance has been part of that history to make a much-needed change, there is still so much more change that is needed. There are still great disparities for those with SMI and experiences of marginalization, stigma, oppression, trauma and death, and racism, impacting outcomes for those with SMI (Daniels et al, 2023; Eswaran et al, 2023; Frueh et al, 2005; Kersting et al, 2019; Perlin, 2013; Smith et al, 2022; Sturmey, 2015; Waldemar et al, 2019). For example, those with SMI are more likely to be put in restraints just because they have a diagnosis of schizophrenia (in comparison to those without that diagnosis) despite no prior history of violence or indication of current violence upon presentation to an emergency room in crisis, with higher incidents among individuals who are Black (Daniels et al, 2023; Eswaran et al, 2023).…”

Section: Future Action For Addressing Social Justice Action In Mental...mentioning

confidence: 99%

A history of the community mental health movement and individuals with serious mental illness: A vision for the future.

Carr

2024

American Journal of Orthopsychiatry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The history of the development of the Global Alliance for Behavioral Health and Social Justice was founded on understanding the social determinants of mental health and society and the necessity for multiple disciplines to organize advocacy for human rights and social justice. This led way to a wide cross-section of disciplines working together to engage at the policy level, in legislation, and within community settings as the Community Mental Health Movement developed and made a path for the reformation of many forms within the mental health field. This article reviews some of that interesting history and the importance of understanding those fundamental roots as we also look at the future for what is next in advocacy, social justice action, and policy directions for advancing the lives of those with serious mental illness, who face some of the most oppressive forms of marginalization and rejection of human rights and citizenship. This article will outline social justice action agendas for the organization and diverse collaborative fields to pursue as we embark upon the future and envision the full rights of citizenship for those with serious mental illness. This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.

show abstract

“…Recent evidence has demonstrated more than a 50% increase in the use of such practices on adults with a learning disability in hospitals in England from 2016 to 2017 [ 13 ]. The consequences of the use of restrictive practices can result in significant trauma for patients, physical injuries and burnout for staff, frustration and reduced quality of life for carers [ 11 , 14 – 16 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Approaches used to prevent and reduce the use of restrictive practices on adults with learning disabilities: Protocol for a realist review

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction The use of restrictive practices has significant adverse effects on the individual, care providers and organisations. This review will describe how, why, for whom, and in what circumstances approaches used by healthcare organisations work to prevent and reduce the use of restrictive practices on adults with learning disabilities. Methods and analysis Evidence from the literature will be synthesised using a realist review approach - an interpretative, theory-driven approach to understand how complex healthcare approaches work in reducing the use of restrictive practices in these settings. In step 1, existing theories will be located to explore what approaches work by consulting with key topic experts, holding consultation workshops with healthcare professionals, academics, and experts by experience, and performing an informal search to help develop an initial programme theory. A systematic search will be performed in the second step in electronic databases. Further searches will be performed iteratively to test particular subcomponents of the initial programme theory, which will also include the use of the CLUSTER approach. Evidence judged as relevant and rigorous will be used to test the initial programme theory. In step three, data will be extracted and coded inductively and deductively. The final step will involve using a realist logic of analysis to refine the initial programme theory in light of evidence. This will then provide a basis to describe and explain what key approaches work, why, how and in what circumstances in preventing and reducing the use of restrictive practices in adults with learning disabilities in healthcare settings. Results Findings will be used to provide recommendations for practice and policymaking. Registration In accordance with the guidelines, this realist review protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on 4th December 2019 (CRD42019158432).

show abstract

Epidemiology

Cited by 4 publications

References 0 publications

Patient-self-reported history of restraint among 17-year-olds: a retrospective study of records by non-specialist dentists in the public dental service in Hordaland, Norway

Patient-self-reported history of restraint among 17-year-olds: a retrospective study of records by non-specialist dentists in the public dental service in Hordaland, Norway

A history of the community mental health movement and individuals with serious mental illness: A vision for the future.

Approaches used to prevent and reduce the use of restrictive practices on adults with learning disabilities: Protocol for a realist review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About