Epidemiological methods in diarrhoea studies—an update

Abstract

Background Diarrhoea remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality but is difficult to measure in epidemiological studies. Challenges include the diagnosis based on self-reported symptoms, the logistical burden of intensive surveillance and the variability of diarrhoea in space, time and person.Methods We review current practices in sampling procedures to measure diarrhoea, and provide guidance for diarrhoea measurement across a range of study goals. Using 14 available data sets, we estimated typical design effects for clustering at household and village/neighbourhood level, and measured the impact of adjusting for baseline variables on the precision of intervention effect estimates.Results Incidence is the preferred outcome measure in aetiological studies, health services research and vaccine trials. Repeated prevalence measurements (longitudinal prevalence) are appropriate in high-mortality settings where malnutrition is common, although many repeat measures are rarely useful. Period prevalence is an inadequate outcome if an intervention affects illness duration. Adjusting point estimates for age or diarrhoea at baseline in randomized trials has little effect on the precision of estimates. Design effects in trials randomized at household level are usually <2 (range 1.0–3.2). Design effects for larger clusters (e.g. villages or neighbourhoods) vary greatly among different settings and study designs (range 0.1–25.8).Conclusions Using appropriate sampling strategies and outcome measures can improve the efficiency, validity and comparability of diarrhoea studies. Allocating large clusters in cluster randomized trials is compromized by unpredictable design effects and should be carried out only if the research question requires it.

H2S as an Indicator of Water Supply Vulnerability and Health Risk in Low-Resource Settings: A Prospective Cohort Study

“…Although caregiver-reported illness could be subject to under-reporting, 27 we validated the community-based diarrhea surveillance with clinic records in the study villages. 25 With respect to water quality analysis, we conducted a few initial side-by-side comparisons of our total coliform and E. coli diagnostics with Coliscan membrane filter medium (Micrology Laboratories CMFK2; Micrology Laboratories, Goshen, Indiana).…”

“…The primary health outcome in this study was caregiver-reported diarrhea during the 7 days before the visit among children 5 years of age at enrollment; we defined diarrhea as three or more loose or watery stools in 24 hr or a single stool with blood or mucus. 26,27 Field interviewers collected caregiver-reported symptoms during each monthly home visit with the aid of a health calendar. 28 Statistical analysis.…”

Village Sanitation and Children's Human Capital: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment by the Maharashtra Government

“…12 Although many epidemiological studies use survey-reported diarrhea as a dependent variable, we make no attempt to study this noisy and unreliable outcome measure (Schmidt et al, 2011). For example, Zwane et al (2011) show that households randomly selected to be surveyed more frequently report less child diarrhea.…”

Population based self-reported acute gastrointestinal infection in slovenia: multiplier study

“…To measure the exact burden of AGI by means of epidemiological studies is a demanding task (2). Assessments of disease burden are often based on singular health metrics such as incidence, prevalence or mortality data alone (3).…”