The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2014
DOI: 10.2147/ndt.s53913
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epidemiological, humanistic, and economic burden of illness of lower limb spasticity in adults: a systematic review

Abstract: BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to investigate the epidemiological, humanistic, and economic burden of illness associated with adult lower limb spasticity (LLS) and its complications.MethodsA systematic search of MEDLINE and EMBASE identified 23 studies published between January 2002 and October 2012 that assessed the epidemiology, impact, and resource use associated with LLS. A hand-search of four neurology conferences identified abstracts published between 2010 and 2012.ResultsLLS was found to occur … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
30
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(63 reference statements)
1
30
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Upon being included in the study, patients received individualised, flexible injection regimens, in which dosing and injection frequency were at the investigators' discretion and aligned with routine clinical practice. Mean injection intervals (time to retreatment = 4.4 and 4.5 months) were longer than the recommended interval of 12 weeks [38], which may reduce treatment burden for both patients and physicians [42]. This long-lasting efficacy of aboBoNT-A in adult spasticity is consistent with previous upper [12,31] and lower [28] limb Table S4 (supplementary materials).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Upon being included in the study, patients received individualised, flexible injection regimens, in which dosing and injection frequency were at the investigators' discretion and aligned with routine clinical practice. Mean injection intervals (time to retreatment = 4.4 and 4.5 months) were longer than the recommended interval of 12 weeks [38], which may reduce treatment burden for both patients and physicians [42]. This long-lasting efficacy of aboBoNT-A in adult spasticity is consistent with previous upper [12,31] and lower [28] limb Table S4 (supplementary materials).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“… 8 When comparing the present results with the strength of the literature for AULS, it is apparent that more high-quality studies are required to inform practice. This need for more research is not limited to the use of ABO in ALLS, but there is also a clear and urgent need to better understand the burden of the condition 2 and also the effectiveness of other treatments (including other BoNT formulations). 22 Such work is ongoing and over 10 clinical trials of interventions for ALLS are listed on clinicaltrials.gov (including a double-blind study with ABO NCT01249404 and its open label extension study NCT01251367).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If left unmanaged, patients with ALLS are often predisposed to secondary complications of reduced mobility such as tendon shortening, joint deformity, and eventually immobilization. 2 These secondary complications can themselves cause more systemic complications including deep vein thrombosis 3 and pressure ulcers. 4 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La espasticidad tiene una prevalencia en el miembro inferior post-ECV de 40-600/100.000 e incidencia de 30-485/100.000; la cual genera un impacto negativo en la movilidad, funcionalidad y la calidad de vida 12 . Los estudios han mostrado que seis meses post-ECV entre el 60-80% de los pacientes caminan independientemente y el 26% son dependientes en las AVD 13,14 , por lo cual, el paciente puede requerir de ayudas funcionales o la supervisión de un cuidador 15 . Adicionalmente, se ha encontrado una disminución significativa en pacientes con espasticidad de la funcionalidad (mediana Índice de Barthel 63,3 puntos), comparado con pacientes sin espasticidad (mediana 80,6; p= 0.07) 7 .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified