1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(96)00297-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epidemiological features of first-visit outpatients in Japan: Comparison with general population and variation by sex, age, and season

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

30
107
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

8
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
30
107
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, because cases and controls were selected from the same hospital and almost all patients lived in the Tokai area of central Japan, the internal validity of this case-control study is likely to be acceptable. External validity (generalizability of the results) has been confirmed in our previous study, 42 as characteristics of the study sample are similar to the general population in the Tokai area. To limit any bias that might have resulted from the inclusion of a specific diagnostic group that is related to the exposure, we did not set eligibility criteria for control diseases.…”
Section: Epidemiologysupporting
confidence: 67%
“…However, because cases and controls were selected from the same hospital and almost all patients lived in the Tokai area of central Japan, the internal validity of this case-control study is likely to be acceptable. External validity (generalizability of the results) has been confirmed in our previous study, 42 as characteristics of the study sample are similar to the general population in the Tokai area. To limit any bias that might have resulted from the inclusion of a specific diagnostic group that is related to the exposure, we did not set eligibility criteria for control diseases.…”
Section: Epidemiologysupporting
confidence: 67%
“…External validity (generalizability of the results) has been confirmed in our previous study. 30 In addition, to dilute any bias that might have resulted from the inclusion of a specific diagnostic group that is related to the exposure, we did not set eligibility criteria for control diseases. As for allele frequencies in the subjects, given that our frequencies were comparable to those previously reported in public databases such as HapMap JPT, 31 bias in the distribution of selected polymorphisms was negligible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the general population randomly selected from the electoral roll in the same area, the general lifestyle of noncancer cases presenting at Aichi Cancer Center, including their dietary habits, was not found to demonstrate any differences. 32 Another potential source of bias is the medical background of control subjects, but we had already clarified that the majority did not One case and eight control subjects were excluded from analyses (see Table I). ORs and their 95% CIs were adjusted for BMI (continuous), habitual exercise, drinking and smoking status, green-yellow vegetable intake (g/1,000 kcal), menopausal status (pre-or post-menopause), family history of breast cancer in parents and/or siblings (yes or no), age at menarche ( 12, 13-14 or 15 years), menopausal periods (continuous), parity (0, 1, 2 or 3) and hormone users (yes or no).-2 SFAs (saturated fatty acids) 5 14:0 1 16:0 1 18:0.-3 MUFAs (monounsaturated fatty acids) 5 16:1n-7 1 18:1n-9.-4 PUFAs (polyunsaturated fatty acids) 5 n-6 PUFAs 1 n-3 PUFAs.-5 n-6 PUFAs 5 18:2n-6 1 18:3n-6 1 20:3n-6 1 20:4n-6 (arachidonic acid, AA).-6 n-3 PUFAs 5 18:3n-3 1 n-3 highly unsaturated fatty acids (HUFAs).-7 n-3 HUFAs 5 20:5n-3 (eicosapentaenoic acid, EPA) 1 22:5n-3 1 22:6n-3 (docosahexaenoic acid, DHA).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our previous study demonstrated that it is feasible to use non-cancer outpatients at ACCH as controls in epidemiological studies because their general lifestyles are accordant with those of general population randomly selected from the electoral roll in Nagoya City, Aichi Prefecture. 32 …”
Section: Case and Control Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%