2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epidemiological cut-off value of clinical isolates of Burkholderia pseudomallei from Northern Queensland to meropenem, ceftazidime, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and doxycycline by the microbroth dilution method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An earlier study by Maloney et al generated MIC distributions of B. pseudomallei for ceftazidime, meropenem, doxycycline and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole [30]. The researchers used the reference BMD method to test 234 consecutive, clinical B. pseudomallei isolates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An earlier study by Maloney et al generated MIC distributions of B. pseudomallei for ceftazidime, meropenem, doxycycline and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole [30]. The researchers used the reference BMD method to test 234 consecutive, clinical B. pseudomallei isolates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In northern Queensland, the microbroth dilution method has been used to provide epidemiological cut-off values of clinical isolates of B. pseudomallei to meropenem, ceftazidime, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) and doxycycline [ 74 ]. Meropenem and ceftazidime provide reliable first-line agents against melioidosis, with primary resistance being extremely rare [ 75 , 76 ].…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensitive, intermediate and resistant cut-offs were based on the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M100-S17 guidelines for B. pseudomallei (≤8/4, 16/8, and ≥32/16 µg/mL for AMC; ≤8, 16, ≥32 µg/mL for CAZ; ≤4, 8, ≥16 µg/mL for DOX and IPM; ≤2/38, nil, ≥4/76 µg/mL for SXT). CLSI guidelines do not list MEM for B. pseudomallei ; however, based on prior work [ 16 , 17 ], and recent proposed EUCAST breakpoints for B. pseudomallei , we categorised MEMr as ≥3 µg/mL. Likewise, the CLSI guidelines do not list gentamicin (GEN) MIC values for B. pseudomallei due to almost ubiquitous resistance (>16 µg/mL) towards this antibiotic; however, there are notable exceptions [ 18 , 19 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%