2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epidemiological assessment of acetabular fractures in a level one trauma centre: A 7-Year observational study

Abstract: The present study was conducted to evaluate the epidemiological characteristics of the Acetabular fractures treated in a level one trauma centre of India. This study is one of the largest to provide first-hand information regarding the demography, fracture patterns, other associated injuries, and the hospital stay of acetabular fractures in India. Method: Patients admitted with the diagnosis of acetabular fractures between January 2013 and November 2019 were retrospectively analyzed in terms of demographic dat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, lower limb fractures were observed in 32% of pelvic ring fractures and 36% of acetabular fractures. This is comparable with epidemiological analysis in India demonstrating lower limb fractures in 29% of pelvic ring fractures and 26% of acetabular fractures[ 6 , 16 ]. When comparing pelvic ring and acetabular fractures, there was a significant association between pelvic ring fractures and both spine fractures ( P < 0.001) and abdominal injury ( P = 0.01).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In our study, lower limb fractures were observed in 32% of pelvic ring fractures and 36% of acetabular fractures. This is comparable with epidemiological analysis in India demonstrating lower limb fractures in 29% of pelvic ring fractures and 26% of acetabular fractures[ 6 , 16 ]. When comparing pelvic ring and acetabular fractures, there was a significant association between pelvic ring fractures and both spine fractures ( P < 0.001) and abdominal injury ( P = 0.01).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…With an enlarging population of older people, the former group now represents the bigger subset of patients who present with factors associated with unfavourable outcomes [18]. Patients over the age of 60 years historically comprised about 11-18% of all acetabular fractures [21,29,30] and more recent articles report a strong increase in incidence among elderly subjects sustaining such injuries of up to 64% [31][32][33]. When treated with ORIF, the proportion requiring THA for post-traumatic arthritis can range 22-64% at 3 years [2][3][4][34][35][36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trikha et al and Fakru et al reported the posterior wall fracture as the most common type of acetabular fracture, whereas in our studied population, the dominant injury was anterior column fracture. This nding is particularly intriguing considering that all three studies identi ed tra c accidents as the main cause of acetabular fractures [28,29]. Providing a satisfactory explanation for these discrepancies seems challenging at this point.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%