1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7519(98)00066-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epidemiological aspects of the use of live anticoccidial vaccines for chickens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
129
3
12

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 201 publications
(150 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
6
129
3
12
Order By: Relevance
“…It is notable that the litter oocyst concentrations for birds treated with anticoccidial drugs were much lower than those for vaccinated birds (Figure 1). This was a reversal of the usual situation (Williams, 1992b(Williams, , 1998Shirley et al, 1995;Williams et al, 1999), although it has sometimes been observed before (Shirley et al, 1995;Williams et al, 1999). It may indicate either that the field challenge on the anticoccidial drugtreated farm was very low, or that the resident coccidia were more sensitive than usual to the anticoccidial drugs used there.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is notable that the litter oocyst concentrations for birds treated with anticoccidial drugs were much lower than those for vaccinated birds (Figure 1). This was a reversal of the usual situation (Williams, 1992b(Williams, , 1998Shirley et al, 1995;Williams et al, 1999), although it has sometimes been observed before (Shirley et al, 1995;Williams et al, 1999). It may indicate either that the field challenge on the anticoccidial drugtreated farm was very low, or that the resident coccidia were more sensitive than usual to the anticoccidial drugs used there.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…This 'shoulder' coincided exactly with the period of highest oocyst accumulation in the litter of the anticoccidial drug-treated birds. Although the patterns are not typical of what is generally observed in Paracox-vaccinated and anticoccidial drug-treated birds (Williams, 1992b(Williams, , 1998, they may be regarded as variants of the usual patterns, considering the wide variations in oocyst counts that might be encountered (Shirley et al, 1995;Williams et al, 1999). It is clear, for instance, that the first oocysts seen in vaccinated flocks appeared 13 to 20 days earlier than those first to be seen in the anticoccidial drug-treated birds, indicating that the faster developing precocious lines contributed to at least the earlier portion of the peak in vaccinated birds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The pathogenicity ranges from moderate to severe. Although E. praecox and E. mitis are considered non pathogenic, experimental infections with these species may produce pathogenesis resulting in enteritis, diarrhoea, and reduced feed efficiencies (Williams 1998), which warrants their inclusion in the list of coccidia to be controlled. Generally, the five most pathogenic species can be differentiated in the host on the basis of clinical signs, characteristic tissue lesions, prepatent period, size of oocysts, and morphology of intracellular stages.…”
Section: Diagnosis and Identification At Species Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The annual worldwide losses due to coccidiosis exceed two billion Euros for prophylaxis and medication [1]. Additional economic losses include mortality, morbidity, and poor feed conversion of birds that survive out breaks [2]. Eimeria, an intracellular protozoan parasite belongs to the Phylum Apicomplexa, is the causative agent of coccidiosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%