2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.05.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epidemiological aspects of filariosis in dogs on the coast of Paraná state, Brazil: with emphasis on Dirofilaria immitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
23
0
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
23
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…An elevated percentage of occult filarial infection in dogs was also reported by Rawlings et al (1982), Grieve et al (1986), Reifur et al (2004), andYildirim et al (2007), and also by Labarthe et al (1997) in cats, while Tasić et al (2008) detected a low rate of occult infection in Serbia. These authors associated the low rate with a recent concentration of dirofilariasis in this region.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…An elevated percentage of occult filarial infection in dogs was also reported by Rawlings et al (1982), Grieve et al (1986), Reifur et al (2004), andYildirim et al (2007), and also by Labarthe et al (1997) in cats, while Tasić et al (2008) detected a low rate of occult infection in Serbia. These authors associated the low rate with a recent concentration of dirofilariasis in this region.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The heartworm parasite is still most frequent in coastal areas, but the huge influx of people (and their pets) to developing cities such as Porto Velho may be the cause of the spread of heartworm disease within the country (ARAUJO et al, 2003;BENDAS et al, 2007;LABARTHE et al, 1998;REIFUR et al, 2004;TRAVERSA, 2012). The lower prevalence in areas far from the coast may be linked to the vectors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These states had previously been reported to have high rates of heartworm infection. The minimum number of samples to be obtained in each state was calculated with Epi Info 2000 (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia) for determining 90% confidence intervals, considering the canine population to be 15% of the human population [17] and the estimated heartworm prevalence to be as reported previously [2,[4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence of the parasite in Brazil was reported to be 8% during the 1980s [1], with hotspots that could be as high as 45% in the coastal lowlands of the state of São Paulo [2] and in the eastern lowland section of the state of Rio de Janeiro [3]. Several canine heartworm hotspots were identified in coastal areas such as Florianópolis (12%), state of Santa Catarina [4]; Guaratuba (6%) and Guaraqueçaba (21%), state of Paraná [5]; Bertioga (45%) and Guarujá (14%), state of São Paulo [2], região dos lagos (52%) and Niterói (37%), state of Rio de Janeiro [3]; Recife (12%) [6] and Itamaracá (29%) [7], state of Pernambuco; and Salvador (5.4%) and Lauro de Freitas (23.3%), state of Bahia [8]. As awareness of the disease increased following introduction of chemoprophylatic drugs in Brazil and with the increased treatment of canine tick-borne diseases, the number of heartworminfected dogs declined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%