2022
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10091809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epidemiological and Serological Analysis of a SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak in a Nursing Home: Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination and Enhanced Neutralizing Immunity Following Breakthrough Infection

Abstract: Background: Despite a vaccination rate of 82.0% (n = 123/150), a SARS-CoV-2 (Alpha) outbreak with 64.7% (n = 97/150) confirmed infections occurred in a nursing home in Bavaria, Germany. Objective: the aim of this retrospective cohort study was to examine the effects of the Corminaty vaccine in a real-life outbreak situation and to obtain insights into the antibody response to both vaccination and breakthrough infection. Methods: the antibody status of 106 fully vaccinated individuals (54/106 breakthrough infec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With one exception (i.e., VITROS immunoassay), the observed sensitivities obtained with the conventional approach—and in a predominantly vaccinated population—were lower than those previously reported in unvaccinated populations (Table S3). This observation is consistent with the blunted anti‐N response in vaccinated individuals [3–7]. Notably, with samples collected ~1 month after a positive SARS‐CoV‐2 test result, none of the study immunoassays would meet Canada's regulatory requirement for sensitivity (i.e., ≥95% [11]) if these immunoassays were used in a vaccinated population and the results were analysed with the conventional approach using manufacturer‐recommended cutoffs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With one exception (i.e., VITROS immunoassay), the observed sensitivities obtained with the conventional approach—and in a predominantly vaccinated population—were lower than those previously reported in unvaccinated populations (Table S3). This observation is consistent with the blunted anti‐N response in vaccinated individuals [3–7]. Notably, with samples collected ~1 month after a positive SARS‐CoV‐2 test result, none of the study immunoassays would meet Canada's regulatory requirement for sensitivity (i.e., ≥95% [11]) if these immunoassays were used in a vaccinated population and the results were analysed with the conventional approach using manufacturer‐recommended cutoffs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…However, blood services faced many challenges while conducting these serosurveys, including the fact that the anti-N response to an infection is often blunted and hardly detectable in recipients of a SARS-CoV-2 messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccine [3][4][5][6][7]. This issue may be addressed in at least two ways.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 15 manuscripts have been published in this Special Issue. These papers provided insights into epidemiology, pathogenesis, epigenetics [3,4] COVID-19 emergencies in hospital settings [5,6], advanced diagnosis [6][7][8], vaccination [9,10], and SARS-CoV-2 infection in the experimental setting [11]. The high scientific rigor, originality, and, for some of them, the high number of citations obtained, are well evident.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Finally, considering the emergence of new variants, especially from countries where there has not been much stratification of vaccination, how will the situation evolve in general? From the literature data, it appears that breakthrough infections can significantly enhance α-Sand neutralizing antibody responses, indicating a possible benefit from booster vaccinations [9,10,20]. It is not excluded that many of these questions may be answered in the second edition (2023) of this Special Issue.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%