2016
DOI: 10.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n6p4119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epidemiological analysis of infection by the bovine viral diarrhea virus on family farms in Brazil

Abstract: The aim of the present study was to determine the seroprevalence of infection by the bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) on family farms, as well as to study the risk factors associated with the infection. In total, 319 blood serum samples were collected from cattle, of reproductive age (>24 months) in 24 herds from 11 cities of the brejo microregion in Pernambuco. The samples were subjected to the seroneutralization test to detect anti-BVDV antibodies. In order to identify the risk factors associated with the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The present nding was the smallest seroprevalence reported when compared with the different studies in Ethiopia and much lower from the reported prevalence of 78.8% in Mexico, 77.9% in Iran, 64.4% in Nigeria, 61.6% in Croatia, 51.1% in Bangladesh and 33.2 in Malaysia by [43], [44], [45], [46], and [47], respectively in different parts of the world. The low prevalence of the present study might be due to differences in sample size, sampling frame, study periods, breeds of animals, cattle management systems and the speci city and sensitivity of the kits used.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…The present nding was the smallest seroprevalence reported when compared with the different studies in Ethiopia and much lower from the reported prevalence of 78.8% in Mexico, 77.9% in Iran, 64.4% in Nigeria, 61.6% in Croatia, 51.1% in Bangladesh and 33.2 in Malaysia by [43], [44], [45], [46], and [47], respectively in different parts of the world. The low prevalence of the present study might be due to differences in sample size, sampling frame, study periods, breeds of animals, cattle management systems and the speci city and sensitivity of the kits used.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…A cross sectional study was carried out in eight properties distributed in six counties in Pernambuco state, Brazil. To compose the study sample, a total of 10,500 heads [20] was analyzed, with an expected prevalence of 51.1% for BVDV [26] and 79.5% for IBR [31]. These parameters provided a minimum sample size of 196 for BVDV and 128 animals for IBR, with a 95% confidence interval, and a statistical error of 7% [33].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…are individually reported in cattle herds throughout the country (Cortez et al, 2006;Lobato et al, 2015;Richtzenhain et al, 1999a;Richtzenhain et al, 1999b), including Minas Gerais State (Araújo, Moreira, Naveda, Silva, & Contreras, 2005;Castro et al, 1992;. A few studies described the presence of these pathogens also in family farms from the States of Mato Grosso do Sul (Tomich et al, 2009), Paraíba (R. M. Oliveira et al, 2013), Pernambuco (Rêgo et al, 2016) and Rondônia (Okuda et al, 2006), however, the intercurrence of these five agents was not previously evaluated in this type of cattle raising system in Brazil. The determination of the prevalence of seropositive animals and herds, and the simultaneous occurrence of different infectious agents, besides the association between common risk factors and those infections or co-infections, can be very useful to optimize reproductive disease control programs in family farms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%