Epidemiologic profile and quality of life of patients treated for oral cancer in Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil

de-Jesus, Rodolfo-Ribeiro; Meyer, Tufi-Neder; Leite, Isabel Cristina Gonçalves; Pereira, Alessandro-Antonio-Costa; Armond, Mônica-Costa

doi:10.4317/medoral.15.e20

Cited by 3 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 17 publications

(13 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The majority of the sample was comprised of male subjects (78.6%), with a mean age of 56.7 years (20-81.6) and presented low socioeconomic status (89.3% classified in the lowest stratum according to the Brazilian Economic Classification Criteria), which is similar to sample characteristics found in other Brazilian studies ( 14 - 16 ). The association between low socioeconomic status and the occurrence of HNC was also evidenced in a systematic review by Boing and Antunes ( 17 ).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 76%

Factors associated with the quality of life of subjects with facial disfigurement due to surgical treatment of head and neck cancer

Nogueira¹,

Adorno²,

Mendonça³

et al. 2018

Med Oral

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundFacial disfigurement has been considered one of the most challenging consequences of the surgical treatment for head and neck cancer patients, mainly due to the importance of the facial region for the personal identity, body self-image and interpersonal interactions, which might affect negatively the quality of life. The aim of this study was to assess factors associated with the quality of life of subjects with facial disfigurement due to surgical treatment.Material and MethodsClinical data were retrieved from 103 patient’s medical records and quality of life data were collected using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT-H&N) questionnaire. Moreover, the degree of facial disfigurement was classified by means of a specific ordinal scale.ResultsData from the FACT-H&N questionnaire showed that the domain directly related to head and neck symptoms was considered the most impacted, while emotional domain was the least affected. Lower quality of life was associated with sequels in the neck and/or lower third of the face (β=-0.39; p=0.001), a higher level of disfigurement (β=-0.29; p=0.016) and female gender (β=-0.20; p=0.038).ConclusionsDisfigurement due to surgical treatment was significantly associated with the functional dimension of the patients, especially in extensive sequels in the cervical and lower regions of the face. Key words:Quality of life, Head and neck cancer, Patient-reported outcomes.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 76%

Factors associated with the quality of life of subjects with facial disfigurement due to surgical treatment of head and neck cancer

Nogueira¹,

Adorno²,

Mendonça³

et al. 2018

Med Oral

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Most studies consisted exclusively of either lung (48.1%, n =63; e.g., (53, 85, 86, 116, 121, 146)) or head/neck (42.7%, n =56; e.g., (38, 49, 59, 72, 79)) cancer patients. Other clinical characteristics are summarized in Table 1.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…When this information was reported, data were typically collected directly from participants (57.3%, n =75; e.g., (59, 65, 86, 110, 136)). When chart reviews were used to measure tobacco use (14.5%, n =19) (9, 31, 33, 43, 48, 50, 66, 68, 79, 91, 93, 94, 98, 108, 118, 142, 146, 147, 150), it was often unclear whether the data arose from patient report and/or clinician ratings.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Ns denote number of studies in the analysis for Full Sample/Current Smokers at Cancer Diagnosis. Full Sample: 0-3 includes data from (4, 10, 34, 40, 42, 54, 63, 73, 80, 84, 110, 127, 132, 134, 135, 143, 145, 147, 154); 4-6 includes data from (51, 131, 153); 7-11 includes data from (49, 133); 12-59 includes data from (59, 79, 85, 86, 88, 91, 97, 100, 141, 152); 60+ includes data from (67, 70, 128); and Mixed includes data from (5, 29-31, 46, 52, 56, 62, 69, 90, 94, 95, 98, 103, 112, 115, 120-122, 125, 126, 130, 138). Current Smokers at Cancer Diagnosis: 0-3 includes data from (4, 34, 39, 40, 80, 82, 84, 110, 143, 149); 4-6 includes data from (76, 153); 7-11 includes data from (123); 12-59 includes data from (36, 97); 60+ includes data from (128); and Mixed includes data from (5, 35, 44, 46, 56, 112, 115, 125, 129, 138).…”

Section: Figurementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Ns denote number of studies in the analysis for Full Sample/Current Smokers at Cancer Diagnosis. Full Sample: Before Treatment includes data from (4, 10, 28, 32, 43, 45, 57, 59, 63-65, 68, 73, 74, 84, 99, 101, 102, 106, 108, 109, 111, 114, 127, 132, 134, 143, 148, 151, 154); During Treatment includes data from (34, 40, 75, 104, 110, 118, 121, 133, 145-147, 152) (33, 37, 38, 50, 78, 107, 124, 139, 150); After Treatment includes data from (29, 30, 49, 53, 58-60, 67, 69, 70, 79, 85-87, 89, 92, 97, 98, 100, 103, 105, 119, 122, 128, 138, 141); and Mixed includes data from (5, 41, 42, 46, 47, 52, 55, 61, 62, 73, 77, 80, 83, 90, 91, 93, 94, 96, 115, …”

Section: Figurementioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Systematic Review of Tobacco Use after Lung or Head/Neck Cancer Diagnosis: Results and Recommendations for Future Research

Burris

Studts

DeRosa

et al. 2015

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers &Amp; Prevention

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Tobacco use after cancer diagnosis is associated with adverse cancer outcomes, yet reliable prevalence estimates for this behavior are lacking. We conducted a systematic literature review of the prevalence of current tobacco use among individuals with a history of lung or head/neck cancer (CRD #42012002625). An extensive search of electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science) identified 7,777 potentially relevant papers published between 1980 and 2014, and 131 of these yielded pertinent information. Aggregating results across heterogeneous study designs and diverse patient samples, the overall mean prevalence rate of current tobacco use (mostly cigarette smoking) was 33.0% (median=31.0%). Among current tobacco users at cancer diagnosis, the mean prevalence rate of current tobacco use (mostly cigarette smoking) was 53.8% (median=50.3%). In many cases, an operational definition of “current” tobacco use was absent, and biochemical verification of self-reported smoking status was infrequent. These and other observed methodological limitations in the assessment and reporting of cancer patients’ tobacco use underscore the necessity of uniform tobacco use assessment in future clinical research and cancer care.

show abstract

Características de Casos de Câncer Bucal no Estado da Bahia, 1999-2012: um Estudo de Base Hospitalar

Santos

Carvalho

et al. 2015

Rev. Brasileira.De.Cancerologia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introdução: O câncer bucal representa um grave problema de saúde pública no Brasil e no mundo. As informações dos casos diagnosticados por câncer, assim como os indicadores de mortalidade por essa doença, traduzem o perfil da população acometida por ela, além de auxiliar na formulação de políticas públicas para a prevenção e controle dessa enfermidade e para a melhoria da assistência oncológica. Objetivo: Descrever o perfil clínico e epidemiológico de indivíduos com câncer bucal atendidos em hospitais de referência do Estado da Bahia. Método: Estudo descritivo, retrospectivo, dos casos de câncer bucal provenientes do Sistema de Informatização de Registros Hospitalares de Câncer. Foi realizada análise descritiva das variáveis sociodemográficas, clínicas e relacionadas ao uso de tabaco e álcool. Resultados: Foram incluídos 3.309 casos, com predomínio de homens (70,16%), idade superior a 54 anos (61,43%), pardos (84,15%), com nível de escolaridade baixo (78,68%) e provenientes do interior do Estado (73,20%). O estadiamento IV foi o mais frequente (55,23%), o tipo histológico foi carcinoma de células escamosas (83,61%) e a localização primária do tumor na língua (31,10%). Ao final do primeiro tratamento, apenas 9,31% encontravam-se sem evidência de doença/em remissão completa, enquanto 32,47% foram a óbito. A maioria dos indivíduos apresentava história de consumo de álcool e uso de tabaco. Conclusão: Na Bahia, o câncer bucal tem sido diagnosticado tardiamente e tem acometido mais homens, acima dos 54 anos, de cor parda, com baixa escolaridade, resultando em um percentual importante de óbitos.

show abstract

Epidemiologic profile and quality of life of patients treated for oral cancer in Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil

Cited by 3 publications

References 17 publications

Factors associated with the quality of life of subjects with facial disfigurement due to surgical treatment of head and neck cancer

Factors associated with the quality of life of subjects with facial disfigurement due to surgical treatment of head and neck cancer

Systematic Review of Tobacco Use after Lung or Head/Neck Cancer Diagnosis: Results and Recommendations for Future Research

Características de Casos de Câncer Bucal no Estado da Bahia, 1999-2012: um Estudo de Base Hospitalar

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About