2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-20908-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epidemic spreading in modular time-varying networks

Abstract: We investigate the effects of modular and temporal connectivity patterns on epidemic spreading. To this end, we introduce and analytically characterise a model of time-varying networks with tunable modularity. Within this framework, we study the epidemic size of Susceptible-Infected-Recovered, SIR, models and the epidemic threshold of Susceptible-Infected-Susceptible, SIS, models. Interestingly, we find that while the presence of tightly connected clusters inhibits SIR processes, it speeds up SIS phenomena. In… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
87
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
6
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[11] showed leveraging a heterogeneous network among people to yield more resistance against the epidemic spread of the virus. Epidemic spreading is an important issue that was considered in other networks likes time-varying networks [42] and adaptive ones [43]. Nadini et al [42] used SIR and SIS models and investigated effects of modular and temporal connectivity patterns on epidemic spreading.…”
Section: Topic Diffusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11] showed leveraging a heterogeneous network among people to yield more resistance against the epidemic spread of the virus. Epidemic spreading is an important issue that was considered in other networks likes time-varying networks [42] and adaptive ones [43]. Nadini et al [42] used SIR and SIS models and investigated effects of modular and temporal connectivity patterns on epidemic spreading.…”
Section: Topic Diffusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mathematical analysis above suggests that the ETFM error is minimized, while the error of the EADM should decay as the inverse of the size of the network, 1/N, and coincide with predictions from equation (23). The numerical relative error and normalized root mean squared error are computed as follows:…”
Section: Numericsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison between the theoretical relative error (RE) and normalized root mean squared error (NRMSE) of the EADM, in equation(23), with numerical results of both the EADM and ETFM, in equation(24). Homogeneous backbone networks with λ = 0.02 are studied in panels (a) and (d); homogeneous backbone networks with λ = 0.7 are examined in panels (b) and (e); and of heterogeneous backbone networks with λ min = 0.02 are considered in panels (c) and (f).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the constant rate at which an agent sends links to other peers, following a Poissonian process. The memoryless property implied by the Markovian dynamics greatly simplifies the mathematical treatment of these models, regarding both the topological properties of the time-integrated network representation [7], and the description of the dynamical processes unfolding on activity-driven networks [8][9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the constant rate at which an agent sends links to other peers, following a Poissonian process. The memoryless property implied by the Markovian dynamics greatly simplifies the mathematical treatment of these models, regarding both the topological properties of the time-integrated network representation [7], and the description of the dynamical processes unfolding on activity-driven networks [8][9][10][11][12][13].However, the Markovian assumption in temporal network modeling has been challenged by the increasing availability of time-resolved data on different kinds of interactions, ranging from phone communications [14] and face-to-face interactions [15], to natural phenomena [16,17], biological processes [18] and physiological systems [19][20][21]. These empirical observations have uncovered a rich variety of dynamical properties, in particular that the inter-event times t between two successive interactions (either the creation of the same edge or two consecutive creations of an edge by the same node), ψ(t), follows heavy-tailed distributions [15,22,23].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%