2020
DOI: 10.1080/17489725.2020.1805521
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epidemic contact tracing with smartphone sensors

Abstract: Contact tracing is widely considered as an effective procedure in the fight against epidemic diseases. However, one of the challenges for technology based contact tracing is the high number of false positives, questioning its trustworthiness and efficiency amongst the wider population for mass adoption. To this end, this paper proposes a novel, yet practical smartphone-based contact tracing approach, employing WiFi and acoustic sound for relative distance estimate, in addition to the air pressure and the magne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, although Bluetooth-based tracing is generally considered more accurate than GPS-based strategies, significant issues are present with signal attenuation and accuracy. Signal absorption and reflection by the surrounding environment can lead to inaccuracies in reported distances between users [ 46 , 47 ]. In a recent paper on this topic, Leith and Farrell [ 48 ] evaluated the efficacy of Bluetooth LE technology for COVID-19 contact tracing in real-world environments, including users walking in the city, at a meeting table, in a train carriage, and grocery shopping, as well as assessing the impact of device orientation, use of a handbag, and type of indoor wall on signal attenuation.…”
Section: Key Considerations In App Design and Categoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, although Bluetooth-based tracing is generally considered more accurate than GPS-based strategies, significant issues are present with signal attenuation and accuracy. Signal absorption and reflection by the surrounding environment can lead to inaccuracies in reported distances between users [ 46 , 47 ]. In a recent paper on this topic, Leith and Farrell [ 48 ] evaluated the efficacy of Bluetooth LE technology for COVID-19 contact tracing in real-world environments, including users walking in the city, at a meeting table, in a train carriage, and grocery shopping, as well as assessing the impact of device orientation, use of a handbag, and type of indoor wall on signal attenuation.…”
Section: Key Considerations In App Design and Categoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, merging technical strategies may result in increased overall specificity, particularly for popular Bluetooth-based approaches. A recent paper from Nguyen et al [ 46 ] explored the idea of a multi–smartphone-sensor system for contact tracing using Bluetooth combined with barometer (effected by altitude and winds for indoor or outdoor environments), magnetometer (dynamic time warping used to interpret magnetic field vectors), microphone (high frequency, low amplitude short chirps emitted and time of flight measured), and WiFi data (reliant on a grid of WiFi hotspots). With added distance-based readings (microphone, WiFi), accuracy was increased from 25% to 65%, and the additional inclusion of environmental readings (barometer, magnetometer) further increased accuracy to 87%.…”
Section: Primary Limitations and Concerns In App Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many works leverage geolocation information [17], [18] and proximity sensing [4] to monitor the interaction between any two users. Besides homogeneous sensing, there are also works exploiting the heterogeneous sensing features to improve the distance estimation [19]. However, these works fail to consider the location of the smartphone when the users are doing grocery or working.…”
Section: ) Smartphone-based Contact Tracingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While such contact tracing may result in high false positives, a novel method has been proposed which uses data from six different smartphone sensors for contact tracing. This method outperforms other methods and identifies ~95% fewer false positives, reaching up to ~87% accuracy [ 87 ]. In Table S1 , we have summarized some of the AI/ML models uses and their application in the surveillance of COVID-19.…”
Section: Application Of Ai In Surveillance Of Covid-19mentioning
confidence: 99%