1979
DOI: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1979.tb01994.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epicutaneous Testing

Abstract: The patch test and chamber test are the ordinary methods for detecting delayed type contact allergies. The method, test substances and criteria of positive reactions are already well standardized. Open testing is also used for problematic chemicals such as strong topical medicaments, emulsifiers and propylene glycol. The many problems of standardization are still unresolved in photocutaneous testing. Some chemicals are applied to the skin without occlusion, though the chamber test or patch test methods are use… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Patch test methods and reading were according to internationally accepted criteria (4, 5). The patch test sites were evaluated initially at 2 or 3 days (D).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patch test methods and reading were according to internationally accepted criteria (4, 5). The patch test sites were evaluated initially at 2 or 3 days (D).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Between January 1990 and April 1991, 1158 patients were seen and patch tested in our Allergy Unit; the scoring method recommended by the ICDRG was used for scoring the results (2). An patients were patch tested with the GIRDCA (Gruppo Italiano Ricerca Dermatiti da Contatto Ambientali) standard series; the patch test chemicals were supplied by Hermal (Reinbek, Germany) and by FIR-MA S.p.A. (Florence, Italy).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results were read at D2, D4 or D3 alone. The reading at D3 or D4 was considered positive, if the reaction was equal to or stronger than a palpable erythema, according to the guidelines of the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group (12). Most patients were followed‐up 3 times in the following 2 months to confirm the diagnosis and relevance of positive reactions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%