2020
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa1799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EPIC simulations of Neptune’s dark spots using an active cloud microphysical model

Abstract: The Great Dark Spot (GDS-89) observed by Voyager 2 was the first of several large-scale vortices observed on Neptune, the most recent of which was observed in 2018 in the Northern hemisphere (NDS-2018). Ongoing observations of these features are constraining cloud formation, drift, shape oscillations, and other dynamic properties. In order to effectively model these characteristics, an explicit calculation of methane cloud microphysics is needed. Using an updated version of the Explicit Planetary Isentropic Co… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Vortex oscillations—in both shape and location—were seen in Voyager Neptune imaging (Smith et al., 1989; Sromovsky et al., 1993, 2002), and oscillations provide a major constraint for dynamical models (LeBeau & Dowling, 1998; Hadland et al., 2020; Polvani et al., 1990). A triple‐vortex system on Saturn oscillated in longitude (del Río‐Gaztelurrutia et al., 2018), although long‐lived single Saturnian vortices did not oscillate in Voyager observations (Sánchez‐Lavega et al., 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vortex oscillations—in both shape and location—were seen in Voyager Neptune imaging (Smith et al., 1989; Sromovsky et al., 1993, 2002), and oscillations provide a major constraint for dynamical models (LeBeau & Dowling, 1998; Hadland et al., 2020; Polvani et al., 1990). A triple‐vortex system on Saturn oscillated in longitude (del Río‐Gaztelurrutia et al., 2018), although long‐lived single Saturnian vortices did not oscillate in Voyager observations (Sánchez‐Lavega et al., 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From our microphysics scheme, we can diagnose the particle sizes and terminal velocity, in a similar fashion to Hadland et al (2020), who did the same for methane clouds on Neptune. In the case of ice clouds, we assume that each grid cell has an average cloud particle size.…”
Section: Terminal Velocity and Dissipation Of Cloud Particlesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…We vary the abundance of water in the deep atmosphere between 0.5×, 1× and 2× the nominal solar [O/H] ratio and 2× and 4× the nominal [N/H] ratio to investigate the effect on the dynamics of the wave and resulting cloud formation. The addition of volatiles affects the molar mass, which affects the dynamics of large scale features, (e.g., Hadland et al 2020). However, in this case, the wave forms above the cloud, in a region where the added vapor mass is insignificant, the dynamics of the wave is unaffected by the amount of added volatiles.…”
Section: Water Clouds and Abundancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sedimentation velocity is calculated beforehand for different particle sizes based on Pruppacher & Klett (2010), and fit to a power law as a function of diameter for different pressures, ensuring an accurate and quick treatment of precipitation (Hadland et al 2020). On Jupiter, these are derived for water and ammonia ice, rain and snow.…”
Section: Epic Model and Stratiform Cloud Schemementioning
confidence: 99%