2020
DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ab9b5c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epi-Intra neural probes with glassy carbon microelectrodes help elucidate neural coding and stimulus encoding in 3D volume of tissue

Abstract: Objective. In this study, we demonstrate practical applications of a novel 3-dimensional neural probe for simultaneous electrophysiological recordings from the surface of the brain as well as deep intra-cortical tissue. We used this 3D probe to investigate signal propagation mechanisms between neuronal cells and their responses to stimuli in a 3D fashion. Approach. This novel probe leverage 2D thin-film microfabrication technique to combine an epi-cortical (surface) and an intra-cortical (depth) microelectrode… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 92 ] As previously mentioned, GC shows outperforming properties compared with Pt microelectrodes of similar geometry in terms of electrochemical stability. [ 166 ] The GC microelectrodes have been recently miniaturized and GC MEA intracortical probes demonstrated the capability to record high quality single‐unit neural activity and to detect low dopamine concentrations in vitro and in vivo, [ 18,203,204,205 ] offering great promise for multimodal interaction with the brain. Besides glassy carbon, porous graphene electrodes obtained by laser pyrolysis and subsequent doping with nitric acid exhibited a CIL of 3.1 mC cm −2 and very low impedance (519 Ω at 1 kHz for 250 µm diameter electrodes), which remained relatively stable in PBS solution over 28 days, and showing no physical degradation after 1 million cycles.…”
Section: Carbon Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 92 ] As previously mentioned, GC shows outperforming properties compared with Pt microelectrodes of similar geometry in terms of electrochemical stability. [ 166 ] The GC microelectrodes have been recently miniaturized and GC MEA intracortical probes demonstrated the capability to record high quality single‐unit neural activity and to detect low dopamine concentrations in vitro and in vivo, [ 18,203,204,205 ] offering great promise for multimodal interaction with the brain. Besides glassy carbon, porous graphene electrodes obtained by laser pyrolysis and subsequent doping with nitric acid exhibited a CIL of 3.1 mC cm −2 and very low impedance (519 Ω at 1 kHz for 250 µm diameter electrodes), which remained relatively stable in PBS solution over 28 days, and showing no physical degradation after 1 million cycles.…”
Section: Carbon Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With proper surface modifications, many of these microfiber electrodes can enable closed-loop function as they exhibit appropriate properties for high precision neural recording and stimulation. They have also been demonstrated with better stability when used for neural interfacing (Vomero et al, 2017;Nimbalkar et al, 2018;Vahidi et al, 2020). Among them, CF microelectrodes with small cross sections have been used for detection of neurotransmitters such as dopamine and serotine for over three decades in the brain using fast-scan cyclic voltammetry (Robinson et al, 2003;Dankoski and Wightman, 2013;Taylor et al, 2015;Castagnola et al, 2020).…”
Section: Carbon-based Microfibers For Neural Interfacingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neural stimulation and recording electronics have shrunk to nearly the size of individual neurons (Muller et al, 2015 ). In fact, the same advances from the semiconductor industry have resulted in microfabricated electrodes that are on par with the scale of individual neurons (Vahidi et al, 2020 ). Using these fabrication techniques, electrodes and electronics can be co-located (Datta-Chaudhuri et al, 2016 ; Datta-Chaudhuri et al, 2014a ; Datta-Chaudhuri et al, 2014b ), but these approaches are generally not appropriate for chronic implantation as they lack robust barrier layers.…”
Section: Technical Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%