2018
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(18)32513-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EP-2204: Impact Of A Motion Correction Method (Q.Static) In The Definition Of The Metabolic Tumor Volume

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, while the simultaneous collection of PET and MRI data offers potential advantages in motion correction compared to PET/CT, motion artifacts remain an issue. Static motion correction techniques have been suggested as a possible improvement, but these techniques still require further validation [ 133 ]. Another notable limitation is the inferiority of MRI compared to CT in the assessment of pulmonary nodules due to the low proton density, magnetic susceptibility, and respiratory motion of lung tissue.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, while the simultaneous collection of PET and MRI data offers potential advantages in motion correction compared to PET/CT, motion artifacts remain an issue. Static motion correction techniques have been suggested as a possible improvement, but these techniques still require further validation [ 133 ]. Another notable limitation is the inferiority of MRI compared to CT in the assessment of pulmonary nodules due to the low proton density, magnetic susceptibility, and respiratory motion of lung tissue.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%