2015
DOI: 10.1007/s12016-015-8491-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eosinophilic Drug Allergy

Abstract: While peripheral or tissue eosinophilia may certainly characterize drug eruptions, this feature is hardly pathognomonic for a medication-induced etiology. While delayed drug hypersensitivity reactions with prominent eosinophilic recruitment have been typically classified as type IVb reactions, their pathophysiology is now known to be more complex. Eosinophilic drug reactions have a diversity of presentations and may be benign and self-limited to severe and life-threatening. The extent of clinical involvement i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
0
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, median eosinophil count was high (1,059/μL), and 75.9% of patients had eosinophilia at enrollment. Because peripheral eosinophilia characterizes drug hypersensitivity, frequent presentation of eosinophilia may support the role of hypersensitivity in imatinib‐associated severe skin rash [32]. In addition, although no significant association was found between eosinophil count at enrollment and treatment success or recurrence of skin rash in this study, monitoring eosinophil levels is recommended in patients with imatinib‐associated skin rash to predict progression of rash and determine dose and duration of treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…In the present study, median eosinophil count was high (1,059/μL), and 75.9% of patients had eosinophilia at enrollment. Because peripheral eosinophilia characterizes drug hypersensitivity, frequent presentation of eosinophilia may support the role of hypersensitivity in imatinib‐associated severe skin rash [32]. In addition, although no significant association was found between eosinophil count at enrollment and treatment success or recurrence of skin rash in this study, monitoring eosinophil levels is recommended in patients with imatinib‐associated skin rash to predict progression of rash and determine dose and duration of treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The onset of DRESS usually occurs 2–8 weeks after starting the culprit drug, which implies an even higher temporal delay, when compared to other dDHR. In addition, persistence or evolution of the rash and of the organ failure despite drug discontinuation may occur, possibly as the consequence of concomitant viral reactivation [ 224 ]. The diagnostic work-up of DRESS includes patch tests and intradermal skin test with delayed reading, when clinical history is not able to identify the culprit drug.…”
Section: Eosinophils In Immune-mediated Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The European Registry of Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reaction Criteria are applied for clinical diagnosis of DRESS. 12 Six patients fulfilled these criteria (Table 6). Three or more criteria are required for clinical diagnosis of DRESS.…”
Section: Dress Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%