@ERSpublications Peripheral eosinophils are poorly reproducible; persistent peripheral eosinophilia predicts better outcomes in COPD http://ow.ly/3hvH30gnxkBCite this article as: Rabe KF, Beghé B, Fabbri LM. Peripheral eosinophil count as a biomarker for the management of COPD: not there yet. Eur Respir J 2017; 50: 1702165 [https://doi.org/10.1183/ 13993003.02165-2017.Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with acute and chronic pulmonary as well as systemic inflammation [1]. Anti-inflammatory treatments, such as inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and oral roflumilast, are recommended for COPD patients [2]. These drugs are effective agents for the prevention of COPD exacerbations and improvement of lung function and have various effects on health status, but they are associated with adverse events, the most concerning being pneumonia (ICS) and diarrhoea (roflumilast).It has been recognised for many years that some patients with COPD have eosinophilic airway inflammation both in a stable state [3] and during exacerbations [4]. More recently, the Copenhagen City Lung study strongly suggested that a high peripheral blood eosinophil count (>340 cells per µL) was associated with an increased risk of severe COPD exacerbations [5]. In contrast, and similar to the results of the ECLIPSE study [6] and of ZYSMAN et al. [7], both of which were conducted in patients with COPD, no increased risk of moderate-severe exacerbations was found when a threshold of 2% blood eosinophils was used [5]. Finally, contributing to the overall confusion about the role of eosinophils as a risk factor for COPD outcomes, increased blood eosinophils in patients with COPD were also associated with better lung function, improved quality of life [6,8], and even reduced mortality [9]. However, eosinopenia (counts of <0.05×10 9 per L) seemed to be associated with an increased risk of sepsis [10], worse outcomes in patients presenting to hospital with an acute exacerbation of COPD [11,12], and an increased risk of pneumonia [13].Interestingly, the subgroups of severe COPD patients who improve after taking oral steroids have eosinophilic airway inflammation, unlike the majority who do not respond to oral steroids [14]. Several post hoc analyses of recent randomised clinical trials have clearly shown that the effect of combination therapy with inhaled long-acting β-adrenoceptor agonists (LABA) and ICS [15,16] or triple therapy [17,18] is significantly increased in COPD patients with high blood eosinophil counts at baseline. One prominent exception to these findings is the FLAME (Effect of Indacaterol Glycopyronium vs Fluticasone