2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2007.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eocene adakitic volcanism in southern British Columbia: Remelting of arc basalt above a slab window

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
32
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
4
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3). This value is consistent with recent regional radiometric dating of Allenby Formation volcanics (Ickert et al 2009). As the Ashnola shale is stratigraphically high in the Allenby Formation (Boneham 1968;McMechan 1983;Read 2000), the Princeton chert appears to be the youngest of the Okanagan Highlands floras, as either latest Early Eocene or earliest Middle Eocene.…”
Section: The Princeton Chertsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3). This value is consistent with recent regional radiometric dating of Allenby Formation volcanics (Ickert et al 2009). As the Ashnola shale is stratigraphically high in the Allenby Formation (Boneham 1968;McMechan 1983;Read 2000), the Princeton chert appears to be the youngest of the Okanagan Highlands floras, as either latest Early Eocene or earliest Middle Eocene.…”
Section: The Princeton Chertsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…3). Newer 40 Ar-39 Ar and U-Pb methods of radiometric dating of associated volcanics reinforce this age by placing all Allenby Formation sites, including Thomas Ranch (Dillhoff et al 2013) and several additional key sites such as Driftwood Canyon (Eberle et al 2014) Ickert et al 2009). This new synthesis is presented here in Fig.…”
Section: Leaders In Stratigraphic Palynology: 1961-1980mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The Princeton Basin is considered to be formed within a complex half graben, with structural features including major faults, synclines, and anticlines, indicating a complex structure that included considerable volcanic activity during its formation (McMechan 1983). The depositional low was likely a consequence of crustal extensional activity associated with the uplift of the Rocky Mountains and the underplating of rafted terranes (McMechan 1983;Ickert et al 2009). Shaw (1952) divided the Princeton Group into a Lower Volcanic Formation, the Allenby Formation, and an Upper Volcanic Formation.…”
Section: Princeton Basin: Allenby Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). More recent 40 Ar/ 39 Ar and U-Pb dates from Allenby Formation volcanics are even older, at ϳ52 Ma (e.g., Moss et al 2005;Ickert et al 2009; summarized in Greenwood et al 2016a), with the top of the Allenby Formation likely ϳ48.7 Ma based on an unpublished date for Ash No. 22 in the Princeton Chert (Little et al 2009;Pigg and DeVore 2016).…”
Section: Princeton Basin: Allenby Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Eocene was also a time when economically important regional coal and other mineral reserves were deposited (Ewing 1981;Read 2000). During the Eocene, significant geological events, such as tectonic movements along with associated volcanism, shaped the mountain ranges, plateaus, and valleys that run parallel west of the modern Rocky Mountains, as well as the North American Cordillera as far south as Colorado (Ewing 1981;Gaylord et al 1996;Ickert et al 2009;Mix et al 2011). Many of the fossil-rich Eocene lacustrine shale and coal deposits of British Columbia and adjoining areas of the United States (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%