2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2003.09.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enzymic modification of extruded soy protein concentrates as a method of obtaining new functional food components

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
30
1
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
12
30
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This might be so because peptides released from a network structure of the sunflower protein reveal great flexibility, which helps them to adopt a conformation with hydrophilic groups more exposed outward. This kind of results was earlier observed for Alcalase-treated peanut protein isolate (Zhao et al 2011) and soybean protein concentrate (Surowka et al 2004).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…This might be so because peptides released from a network structure of the sunflower protein reveal great flexibility, which helps them to adopt a conformation with hydrophilic groups more exposed outward. This kind of results was earlier observed for Alcalase-treated peanut protein isolate (Zhao et al 2011) and soybean protein concentrate (Surowka et al 2004).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The case of limited hydrolysis is less conclusive. A decline in the surface hydrophobicity with limited hydrolysis has been reported for soybeans (Jung et al, 2005;Surowka, Zmudzinski, & Surowka, 2004), peanuts , and lentil proteins (Avramenko et al, 2013), in agreement with the present study. Jung et al (2005) proposed that the exposure of buried hydrophobic groups upon limited protein hydrolysis was followed by their aggregation via hydrophobic interactions, thus effectively reburying them within the interior of a larger aggregated structure, resulting in the reduction of surface hydrophobicity.…”
Section: Surface Hydrophobicitysupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Limited hydrolysis (4% DH) by both endo-and exopeptidase treatments significantly reduced the EC for enzyme hydrolysates compared with the control, with the exopeptidase hydrolysates showing the lowest EC values. This was in contrast to the generally recognized trend that EC increases with limited protein hydrolysis up to 5% DH (2,4,5,21). Extensive hydrolysis does have a detrimental effect on EC, but in our case, we observed decreased emulsification even at 4% DH.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…This may partly explain the lack of a significant increase in emulsion stability for this enzyme hydrolysate. Short peptide chains would lead to decreased viscosity of the continuous phase and, although capable of adsorbing to the emulsion interfaces, they cannot form sufficiently strong barriers to prevent coalescence (2). Jet cooking the hydrolysates did not result in consistent trends in emulsion stability with regard to enzyme type.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%