1995
DOI: 10.1021/bi00019a034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enzymic Aminoacylation of tRNA Acceptor Stem Helixes with Cysteine Is Dependent on a Single Nucleotide

Abstract: The discriminator base U73 at the acceptor terminus of Escherichia coli tRNA(Cys) is a determinant for the specific aminoacylation of this tRNA by the cognate cysteine tRNA synthetase. Substitution of U73 has a major deleterious effect on the catalytic efficiency of aminoacylation. Here, we show that an RNA hairpin minihelix and an RNA hairpin microhelix that recreate, respectively, the 12-base pair acceptor-T psi C stem and the 7-base pair acceptor helix of E. coli tRNA(Cys) were aminoacylated with cysteine. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
65
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A: Sequence and cloverleaf structure of E. coli tRNA Cys , where U73 adjacent to the CCA end is boxed+ B: Sequence of the synthetic wild-type RNA helix, where U73 is boxed+ Variants of the helix containing modifications of U73 were tested for aminoacylation with cysteine+ C: The structures of U (uridine) and its pyrimidine analogs, including C (cytidine), m 5 isoC (5-methyl-isocytidine), dT (deoxy-thymidine), s 4 U (4-thio-uridine), and s 2 U (2-thio-uridine)+ RNA helices containing an analog of U73 that have a k cat /K m value of aminoacylation within 10-fold of that of the wild type are denoted as active (ϩ), whereas the C73 helix with a k cat /K m 10 5 -fold below of that of the wild type is inactive (Ϫ)+ tions+ Based on the Lineweaver-Burk plot (Fig+ 2A), the k cat was 1+81 ϫ 10 Ϫ4 s Ϫ1 , which is reduced from that of the full-length transcript of E. coli tRNA Cys (1+27 s Ϫ1 ) by about 10 4 -fold+ The K m was 160 mM, which is higher than the K m of the full-length tRNA (1+28 mM) by about 10 2 -fold (Table 1)+ Both the k cat and K m values were similar to those of our previous report (Hamann & Hou, 1995)+ Together, the k cat /K m of aminoacylation of the microhelix is reduced from that of the full-length tRNA by six orders of magnitude+…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A: Sequence and cloverleaf structure of E. coli tRNA Cys , where U73 adjacent to the CCA end is boxed+ B: Sequence of the synthetic wild-type RNA helix, where U73 is boxed+ Variants of the helix containing modifications of U73 were tested for aminoacylation with cysteine+ C: The structures of U (uridine) and its pyrimidine analogs, including C (cytidine), m 5 isoC (5-methyl-isocytidine), dT (deoxy-thymidine), s 4 U (4-thio-uridine), and s 2 U (2-thio-uridine)+ RNA helices containing an analog of U73 that have a k cat /K m value of aminoacylation within 10-fold of that of the wild type are denoted as active (ϩ), whereas the C73 helix with a k cat /K m 10 5 -fold below of that of the wild type is inactive (Ϫ)+ tions+ Based on the Lineweaver-Burk plot (Fig+ 2A), the k cat was 1+81 ϫ 10 Ϫ4 s Ϫ1 , which is reduced from that of the full-length transcript of E. coli tRNA Cys (1+27 s Ϫ1 ) by about 10 4 -fold+ The K m was 160 mM, which is higher than the K m of the full-length tRNA (1+28 mM) by about 10 2 -fold (Table 1)+ Both the k cat and K m values were similar to those of our previous report (Hamann & Hou, 1995)+ Together, the k cat /K m of aminoacylation of the microhelix is reduced from that of the full-length tRNA by six orders of magnitude+…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…Kinetics of aminoacylation of cysteine was determined under previously established steady-state conditions (Hamann & Hou, 1995)+ The wild-type transcript was assayed in the range of 0+3-10 mM and with 0+8 nM of E. coli cysteine-tRNA synthetase+ The C73 transcript was assayed in the range of 5-50 mM and with 0+5 mM of the cysteine enzyme+ The wildtype helix and the m 5 isoC73 variant were assayed in the range of 20-300 mM with 3 mM of the cysteine enzyme+ For all of these RNA substrates, the reported K m values were in the same range of substrate concentrations that were tested+ This gave credence to the accuracy of the K m values+ However, the s 4 U73 variant was assayed in the range of 50-400 mM with 4+2 mM of the cysteine enzyme+ As the reported K m (1,300 mM) was outside the range of substrate concentrations, it was an estimation+ All other microhelix variants were assayed at 30 mM with 3 mM of the cysteine enzyme and the initial rates of their aminoacylation reactions were used to estimate k cat /K m + The percentage of charging for each substrate (in Table 1) was determined by aminoacylation with substrate levels of cysteine-tRNA synthetase over a 30-min time course+ The plateau of aminoacylation indicated the amount of the substrate that was functional+ This value was then compared to the standard of 1,600 pmol/OD (based on a 100% functional substrate) to determine the percentage of charging+ In this study, all of the RNA substrates had been gel purified and ethanol precipitated+ The percentage of charging for the transcripts of the wild type and the C73 variant that were synthesized by T7 RNA polymerase was estimated to be 30%, whereas that for minihelices that were chemically synthesized was estimated to be 60-80%+…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Minihelices were synthesized by the Nucleic Acid Facility of the University of Pennsylvania+ The substrates Cys-35C and Cys-35A were synthesized by the Biotechnology Resources Facility (Howard Hughes Medical Institute Biopolymer Keck Foundation) at the Yale University School of Medicine+ Minihelices of the correct size were separated from impurities by a 15% polyacrylamide gel in 7 M urea, extracted from gel materials, and eluted in 0+125 M ammonium acetate, 0+125 mM EDTA, and 0+025% SDS at room temperature overnight+ The eluted minihelices were further purified by a C18 reversephase Sep-pak column (Waters) and resuspended in an appropriate concentration (Hamann & Hou, 1995)+ Minihelices (8 mM of gel purified materials) were labeled at the 59 end by T4 polynucleotide kinase (5 U, New England Biolabs) and g-32 P-ATP (3,000 Ci/mmol, NEN) in a 10-mL reaction at 37 8C for 15 min+ After heat denaturation of the kinase enzyme, the labeled minihelices were separated from free ATP by a Centrispin-20 column (Princeton Separation) and used directly+…”
Section: Preparation and Labeling Of Substratesmentioning
confidence: 99%