2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.113622
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enzyme treatments on corn fiber from wet-milling process for increased starch and protein extraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results in line with several previous reports. [ 19,25 ] The acidic media can destroy larger granules and produce smaller particles. [ 19,34 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These results in line with several previous reports. [ 19,25 ] The acidic media can destroy larger granules and produce smaller particles. [ 19,34 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 15,19–24 ] In this regard, proteolytic enzymes by dissolving and disrupting the proteins localized in the endosperm cell wall, accelerate the release of starch into the solvent. [ 25 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It suggested that the ordered structure at short‐range scale cannot be changed by extrusion pretreatment, which was in accordance with the result of XRD. It is important that the inner structure of starch molecules has not been modified during isolation process, [ 27 ] which confirmed the technical feasibility of extrusion‐assisted wet‐milling methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The structure of the kiwifruit cell wall could not be fully destroyed when certain enzymes were lacking, and it was difficult to effectively enzymatically decompose related components. Different types of compound enzymes in the appropriate proportion may stimulate enzyme synergy, which can damage the cell wall, increase the permeability of the cell membrane, and effectively improve the effect of enzymatic hydrolysis [19] . The extraction effect of combination 3 was slightly higher than that of combination 2, but there was no significant difference between the two combinations ( p > 0.05).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%