1959
DOI: 10.3382/ps.0381132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enzyme Supplementation of Barley Diets for Laying Hens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
12
0
1

Year Published

1966
1966
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
5
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Coon et al (1988) reported a higher ADFI and poorer FCR in hens fed enzyme-supplemented barley diets than in hens fed corn diets. In the current experiment, BW gain was greater in hens fed corn or wheat than in hens fed barley, which are results that agree with data of Berg (1959), who reported higher BW gain for hens fed corn than for hens fed barley. In contrast, Frikha et al (2009) reported higher BW gains in pullets fed corn than in pullets fed wheat, both diets being supplemented with enzymes.…”
Section: Productive Performancesupporting
confidence: 95%
“…Coon et al (1988) reported a higher ADFI and poorer FCR in hens fed enzyme-supplemented barley diets than in hens fed corn diets. In the current experiment, BW gain was greater in hens fed corn or wheat than in hens fed barley, which are results that agree with data of Berg (1959), who reported higher BW gain for hens fed corn than for hens fed barley. In contrast, Frikha et al (2009) reported higher BW gains in pullets fed corn than in pullets fed wheat, both diets being supplemented with enzymes.…”
Section: Productive Performancesupporting
confidence: 95%
“…Anderson and Draper (1956) reported layers fed barley diets had lower egg production rates than layers fed corn diets. Jensen et al (1958) and Berg (1959) reported egg weights from hens fed barley diets tended to be smaller than egg weights from layers fed a corn diet.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Under the particular conditions the glucan/β-glucan components give rise to fairly stable highly viscous conditions in the small intestine. INTRODUCTION Increases in nutritional value of barley for chicks by supplementation with various crude enzyme preparations were obtained by Jensen, Fry, Allred and McGinnis (1957), Wharton, Classen and Fritz (1958), Willingham, Jensen and McGinnis (1958), Willingham,Leong,Jensen and McGinnis (i960), Berg (1959), Leardal, Bird, Sunde and Phillips (1959), Arscott,Rose and Harper (i960) and Burnett (1961 and The influence of area of production of barley on its nutritional value, and on the response obtained by enzyme supplementation, has been demonstrated by Leardal et al (1959). Burnett (1964) noted marked differences in nutritional values between barleys grown in Ireland and Australia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%