1982
DOI: 10.1016/0378-1135(82)90009-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of the coronavirus-like agent and its antibodies in pigs with porcine epidemic diarrhea

Abstract: An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was developed for the detection of the coronavirus-like agent in feces of pigs naturally affected with porcine epidemic diarrhea (PED) or experimentally infected with the CV777 isolate. The assay was specific and more sensitive than electron microscopy. An ELISA blocking assay is described for the detection and titration of antibodies. Specific antibody formation was demonstrated in pigs experimentally infected with CV777 and in swine naturally affected in PED.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0
2

Year Published

1994
1994
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
32
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…17,18 In another study in which a blocking ELISA with polyclonal antibodies for antigen capture and detection was used, PEDV was detected only in 30% of the fecal samples taken between 6 and 8 days after experimental inoculation with the CV-777 strain. 2 This finding confirms that the blocking ELISA using MAb CVI-PEDV 66.31 and CVI- PEDV 66.49 has a higher sensitivity for the detection of viral antigen.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…17,18 In another study in which a blocking ELISA with polyclonal antibodies for antigen capture and detection was used, PEDV was detected only in 30% of the fecal samples taken between 6 and 8 days after experimental inoculation with the CV-777 strain. 2 This finding confirms that the blocking ELISA using MAb CVI-PEDV 66.31 and CVI- PEDV 66.49 has a higher sensitivity for the detection of viral antigen.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Because until only recently the virus could not be isolated in cell culture, the development of diagnostic methods for detection of the virus or its antibodies has been impaired. Previous tests for antibody detection used viral antigen produced in experimental animals 2,5 or gut cryostat sections of infected pigs 5,15 PEDV was isolated for the first time in 1988 using the Vero cell line and a trypsin-supplemented medium. 9 Since then, different diagnostic methods 10,11,19 have been described for the detection of both PEDV antigen and its antibodies in experimentally induced infections or in a limited number of field outbreaks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,3,7,23 PEDV antigen has been detected in jejunal and ileal villus enterocytes of swine by monoclonal and polyclonal antibody-based immunohistochemical procedures. 16,21,29 In situ hybridization is a valuable adjunct to standard RNA extraction techniques for evaluating gene expression in tissues and cells.…”
Section: In Situ Hybridization For the Detection And Localization Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immunofluoresence and ELISA tests for the detection of PEDV antigens and antibodies have been developed already [2]. Recently, the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has come into general use for the rapid detection of microbial pathogens and clinical diagnostics because of its high specificity and sensitivity [16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PED has been diagnosed by detection of virus and/or its antigens in feces, or by demonstration of seroconversion, using indirect immunofluorescence test (IIFT) [7,20,21], immunofluorecence blocking test (IFBT) [27], enzymelinked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) blocking test [2] and ELISA [9]; but these methods are time-consuming and require expertise. Recently, PCR has commonly been used to detect genes of viruses, bacteria and protozoa [17,25,26], for time-saving and because of the limited availability of samples.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%