1966
DOI: 10.1177/14.12.929
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enzyme-Labeled Antibodies: Preparation and Application for the Localization of Antigens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
227
0
14

Year Published

1972
1972
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 934 publications
(243 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
227
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Briefly deparaffinized tissue sections obtained from 3 patients were incubated in a 10% solution of H 2 O 2 in 0.05 M Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.6) for 5 h. Then an indirect immunostaining method (Nakane and Pierce, 1966) was applied to these specimens. An antigen retrieval method of pre-preparation of the specimen using 0.1% pronase for 5 minutes was also required for immunostaining with vWF.…”
Section: Light Microscopic Immunohistochemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly deparaffinized tissue sections obtained from 3 patients were incubated in a 10% solution of H 2 O 2 in 0.05 M Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.6) for 5 h. Then an indirect immunostaining method (Nakane and Pierce, 1966) was applied to these specimens. An antigen retrieval method of pre-preparation of the specimen using 0.1% pronase for 5 minutes was also required for immunostaining with vWF.…”
Section: Light Microscopic Immunohistochemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After acetone fixation, sections were processedas described by Nakane and Pierce (40) . As the second antibody, swine-anti-rabbit IgG conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Dakopatts, Denmark) was used and 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole was used as a substrate.…”
Section: Detection Of Lung Metastasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative to fluoresceinated stains is the enzyme-based immunohistochemical methods. 21 Immunoenzyme stains are permanent preparations visible with ordinary light microscopy and may be simultaneously counterstained for optimal demonstration of the histologic lesions, which may assist in establishing the pathogenicity of the agent in the case. 15 This advantage may be particularly important in assessing the contribution of the PI3 virus, given the uncertainty of this virus in BRD cases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%