2020
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c04101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enzyme Immobilization on Graphite Oxide (GO) Surface via One-Pot Synthesis of GO/Metal–Organic Framework Composites for Large-Substrate Biocatalysis

Abstract: Although enzyme immobilization has improved many areas, biocatalysis involving large-size substrates is still challenging for immobilization platform design because of the protein damage under the often “harsh” reaction conditions required for these reactions. Our recent efforts indicate the potential of using Metal–Organic Frameworks (MOFs) to partially confine enzymes on the surface of MOF-based composites while offering sufficient substrate contact. Still, improvements are required to expand the feasible pH… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(87 reference statements)
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lysozyme is a good model because both large (∼μm) and small (∼nm) size substrates can be catalyzed by this enzyme ( Vocadlo et al., 2001 , Kao et al., 2014 ). Meanwhile, MOFs/COFs are advanced porous platforms for enzyme encapsulation ( Howarth et al., 2016 , Majewski et al., 2017 , Drout et al., 2019 , Wang et al., 2020 , Gkaniatsou et al., 2017 , Lyu et al., 2014 , Lian et al., 2017 , Li et al., 2020 , Farmakes et al., 2020 , Neupane et al., 2019 ). Note that, a unique feature of SDSL-EPR is that it is immune of the background matrices (under low water volume; see below) ( Pan et al., 2021a ).…”
Section: Before You Beginmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lysozyme is a good model because both large (∼μm) and small (∼nm) size substrates can be catalyzed by this enzyme ( Vocadlo et al., 2001 , Kao et al., 2014 ). Meanwhile, MOFs/COFs are advanced porous platforms for enzyme encapsulation ( Howarth et al., 2016 , Majewski et al., 2017 , Drout et al., 2019 , Wang et al., 2020 , Gkaniatsou et al., 2017 , Lyu et al., 2014 , Lian et al., 2017 , Li et al., 2020 , Farmakes et al., 2020 , Neupane et al., 2019 ). Note that, a unique feature of SDSL-EPR is that it is immune of the background matrices (under low water volume; see below) ( Pan et al., 2021a ).…”
Section: Before You Beginmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the preparation of enzymes immobilized in MOFs is based on three strategies: encapsulation, surface immobilization, and pore trapping with presynthesized MOFs [180]. Enzymes encapsulated in porous materials such as porous nanoparticles or reversible micelles have better stability under adverse conditions such as high temperature, organic solvents, or extreme pH [181][182][183]. Figure 3 presents enzyme encapsulation in MOFs.…”
Section: Metal-organic Framework (Mofs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon is attributed to the π–π interaction or other hydrophobic interactions between the enzyme active sites and the CNT. Later, the same group deployed similar strategy and coprecipitated lysozyme and MOFs in the presence of graphite oxide (GO) . Two kinds of MOFs (ZIF-8 and CaBDC) were tested for comparison, and CaBDC showed superior performance under acidic condition.…”
Section: De Novo Approach To Encapsulating Enzymes Into Mofsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, the same group deployed similar strategy and coprecipitated lysozyme and MOFs in the presence of graphite oxide (GO). 85 Two kinds of MOFs (ZIF-8 and CaBDC) were tested for comparison, and CaBDC showed superior performance under acidic condition. Similar to CNT, the GO allows lysozyme to stay and function at the composite's surface.…”
Section: De Novo Approach To Encapsulatingmentioning
confidence: 99%