2017
DOI: 10.1002/cphc.201601402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enzyme‐Based Logic Gates and Networks with Output Signals Analyzed by Various Methods

Abstract: The paper overviews various methods that are used for the analysis of output signals generated by enzyme‐based logic systems. The considered methods include optical techniques (optical absorbance, fluorescence spectroscopy, surface plasmon resonance), electrochemical techniques (cyclic voltammetry, potentiometry, impedance spectroscopy, conductivity measurements, use of field effect transistor devices, pH measurements), and various mechanoelectronic methods (using atomic force microscope, quartz crystal microb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 216 publications
(466 reference statements)
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Boolean logic gates realized with enzyme‐catalyzed reactions belong to a novel, but already well developed research area, in the general framework of unconventional computing, more specifically to the areas of molecular and biomolecular computing . The logic gates have been realized in various enzyme‐based systems, including enzymes bound to electrode surfaces, when bioelectrocatalytic currents have been activated/inhibited by various combinations of input signals . The present system based on the PQQ‐GDH‐CaM bound to the electrode surface depends on the presence of two activating substrates, Ca 2+ cations and M13 peptide.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Boolean logic gates realized with enzyme‐catalyzed reactions belong to a novel, but already well developed research area, in the general framework of unconventional computing, more specifically to the areas of molecular and biomolecular computing . The logic gates have been realized in various enzyme‐based systems, including enzymes bound to electrode surfaces, when bioelectrocatalytic currents have been activated/inhibited by various combinations of input signals . The present system based on the PQQ‐GDH‐CaM bound to the electrode surface depends on the presence of two activating substrates, Ca 2+ cations and M13 peptide.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular logic gates constitute a wide range of molecular switches that respond to diverse input signals according to the rules of Boolean logic. Since the inception of the first molecular AND logic gate (de Silva et al, 1993), a wide range of “digital” optical switches (de Ruiter and van der Boom, 2011; de Silva and Uchiyama, 2011; Magri and Mallia, 2013; Ling et al, 2015; Akkaya et al, 2017; Katz, 2017; Erbas-Cakmak et al, 2018; Pilarczyk et al, 2018) and related pattern-generating devices (Rout et al, 2012, 2013, 2014; Sarkar et al, 2016; Hatai et al, 2017; Lustgarten et al, 2017; Pode et al, 2017) have been developed and used for various applications, including information processing (de Ruiter and van der Boom, 2011; de Silva and Uchiyama, 2011; Ling et al, 2015; Akkaya et al, 2017; Katz, 2017; Erbas-Cakmak et al, 2018; Pilarczyk et al, 2018), user identification (Rout et al, 2013; Lustgarten et al, 2017; Andréasson and Pischel, 2018), cryptography (Sarkar et al, 2016; Lustgarten et al, 2017), and sensing (Ling et al, 2015; Wu et al, 2017; Erbas-Cakmak et al, 2018; Magri, 2018). These input-dependent systems were initially considered as potential alternatives to conventional transistors and circuits (de Silva et al, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multifarious molecular logic gates and circuits have been constructed, [ 1–6 ] for the purpose of overcoming limitations of conventional silicon‐based digital devices. Owing to predominant properties of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), DNA‐based logic systems have been fabricated from basic logic gates (YES, OR, AND, IHIBIT etc.)…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%