1994
DOI: 10.1038/nbt0994-905
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enzymatic Separation of High–Quality Uninked Pulp Fibers from Recycled Newspaper

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, photocopiers and laser printers physically bind the ink (thermosetting toners consisting of non-dispersible synthetic polymers) to the fibres as a result of high heat, making it difficult and expensive to remove by conventional chemical methods (Jeffries et al, 1993(Jeffries et al, , 1994. Most of the conventional deinking techniques require large amounts of chemical agents, such as sodium hydroxide, sodium carbonate, diethylenetriaminepentacetic acid, sodium silicate, hydrogen peroxide and surfactants (Prasad et al, 1993;Woodward et al, 1994), resulting in a costly wastewater treatment to meet the environmental regulations (Prasad et al, 1992). Alternatively, enzyme usage has been reported to be a potentially efficient and less polluting solution to overcome this disposal problem (Prasad et al, 1992;Putz et al, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, photocopiers and laser printers physically bind the ink (thermosetting toners consisting of non-dispersible synthetic polymers) to the fibres as a result of high heat, making it difficult and expensive to remove by conventional chemical methods (Jeffries et al, 1993(Jeffries et al, , 1994. Most of the conventional deinking techniques require large amounts of chemical agents, such as sodium hydroxide, sodium carbonate, diethylenetriaminepentacetic acid, sodium silicate, hydrogen peroxide and surfactants (Prasad et al, 1993;Woodward et al, 1994), resulting in a costly wastewater treatment to meet the environmental regulations (Prasad et al, 1992). Alternatively, enzyme usage has been reported to be a potentially efficient and less polluting solution to overcome this disposal problem (Prasad et al, 1992;Putz et al, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different mechanisms for ink removal by the enzymes have been proposed. 15,[38][39][40][41][42] The pectinase enzyme decomposes the polysaccharide matrix from the primary wall (where pectin is present), promoting the swelling of this wall, along with higher porosity and loss of compactness (increased bulk), allowing increased accessibility and higher dissolution capacity of the fibers. Ink particles are then dislodged as the fibers separate during washing.…”
Section: Results and Discussion Effects Of Pectinase Deinking On Physmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most published literature on deinking deals with cellulases and hemicellulases. The mechanism of deinking by these enzymes has not been completely elucidated, although some hypotheses have been described (Eom & Ow, 1990;Kim, Ow, & Eom, 1991;Mohammed, 2010;Putz, Renne, Gottsching, & Jokinen, 1994;Woodward, Stephan, Koran, Wong, & Saddler, 1994;Zeyer, Joyce, Heitmann, & Rucker, 1994). Deinking involves dislodging ink particles from the fibre surfaces then separating the dispersed ink from the fibre suspension by washing or flotation.…”
Section: Enzymes Used In Deinking and Their Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%