2002
DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-3089.2002.01068.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enzymatic removal of αGal antigen in pig kidneys by ex vivo and in vivo administration of endo‐β‐galactosidase C

Abstract: Xenotransplantation using the pig as a donor species is considered to be a promising solution to the serious shortage of organ donors. Both hyperacute and acute vascular rejection (AVR) are believed to be associated with xenoreactive antibody binding to alphaGal epitopes on the pig vascular endothelial cells. Thus, suppression of this antigen-antibody reaction would appear essential for successful long-term xenograft survival. The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of ex vivo and in vivo adminis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inverting nature of family GH110 enzymes excludes such undesired reactions. Considerable efforts have been applied to testing the use of an endo-␤-galactosidase with strict specificity for the Gal␣1-3Gal␤1-4GlcNAc structure (35,(37)(38)(39). The action of this enzyme results in exposure of ␤GlcNAc residues rather that the Gal␤1-4GlcNAc structures exposed with exo-␣-galactosidase strategies, and this may result in other immune problems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inverting nature of family GH110 enzymes excludes such undesired reactions. Considerable efforts have been applied to testing the use of an endo-␤-galactosidase with strict specificity for the Gal␣1-3Gal␤1-4GlcNAc structure (35,(37)(38)(39). The action of this enzyme results in exposure of ␤GlcNAc residues rather that the Gal␤1-4GlcNAc structures exposed with exo-␣-galactosidase strategies, and this may result in other immune problems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ex vivo treatment of the pig kidney by recombinant EndoGalC resulted in almost complete removal of α Gal antigens [9]. In vivo administration of recombinant EndoGalC did remove α Gal antigens on the pig erythrocytes and on the endothelium of the organ [10,11]. In that study, however, it was difficult to completely rule out low‐level contamination by trace amounts of impure materials of bacterial origin in the final preparation of the recombinant EndoGalC [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vivo administration of recombinant EndoGalC did remove α Gal antigens on the pig erythrocytes and on the endothelium of the organ [10,11]. In that study, however, it was difficult to completely rule out low‐level contamination by trace amounts of impure materials of bacterial origin in the final preparation of the recombinant EndoGalC [11]. In fact, producing a large amount of recombinant EndoGalC protein with clinical grade purity is costly and laborious.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as the effect of EndoGalC is temporary, αGal antigens reappear on the cell surface. To inhibit the reappearance of αGal on treated vascular endothelial cells, multiple in vivo administrations of the enzyme might be considered [5]. An alternative approach is to express the enzyme gene in pig endothelial cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%