2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2009.06.189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enzymatic debridement of deeply burned hand and the Debrase® based minimal invasive modality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additional studies to corroborate the findings of our work include Edmondson et al They strongly advocated for modern enzymatic approaches for eschar debridement which have the potential to maximize dermal preservation and improve long‐term scar outcomes 104 . Others considered debriding enzymes as adjuncts to surgical excision, and concluded that NXB is effective in deep burns by decreasing the percentage of grafting required without significant adverse effects 105–107 . Kwa et al found the TCD was the shortest for NXB, while the TWC was the longest compared to tangential excision, hydrosurgery, and shock waves, although this did not lead to decreased scar quality.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additional studies to corroborate the findings of our work include Edmondson et al They strongly advocated for modern enzymatic approaches for eschar debridement which have the potential to maximize dermal preservation and improve long‐term scar outcomes 104 . Others considered debriding enzymes as adjuncts to surgical excision, and concluded that NXB is effective in deep burns by decreasing the percentage of grafting required without significant adverse effects 105–107 . Kwa et al found the TCD was the shortest for NXB, while the TWC was the longest compared to tangential excision, hydrosurgery, and shock waves, although this did not lead to decreased scar quality.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…104 Others considered debriding enzymes as adjuncts to surgical excision, and concluded that NXB is effective in deep burns by decreasing the percentage of grafting required without significant adverse effects. [105][106][107] Kwa et al found the TCD was the shortest for NXB, while the TWC was the longest compared to tangential excision, hydrosurgery, and shock waves, although this did not lead to decreased scar quality. They hypothesized that this may be due to the earlier eschar removal and its implications on the quality of spontaneous healing.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The European consensus guidelines for enzymatic debridement of burn eschar provide a detailed overview of the implementation of bromelain use, a method that is already revolutionizing some aspects of hand burn care 40 . Seven articles assessed the role of enzymatic debridement in hand burns, and these tended to favor enzymatic debridement over other methods, as it tended to be initiated faster and led to more precise burn evaluation and more vital tissue preservation, with fewer procedures until debridement completion, and a marked reduction in the number of wounds requiring skin graft 122–126 . However, a comparison between surgical, enzymatic, and autolytic (hydrocolloid dressing) debridement for deep dermal burns where healing prediction was less than 3 weeks concluded that autolytic debridement using hydrocolloids was found to be the most effective technique with better scar outcomes, healing times, and functional recovery 10,11 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach enhances the likelihood of spontaneous epithelialization, leading to improved aesthetic and functional outcomes. 7 , 23 , 24 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%