2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2020.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enzymatic control of product distribution in terpene synthases: insights from multiscale simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
1
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The gas phase is a natural choice as a reference environment for terpene synthases, 16 as this reflects the inherent reactivity of the reacting species, although organic solvents may also be used. 16,56,59 The current gas-phase free energy profile is similar to that obtained by Sato et al 47 and Hong and Tantillo 46 and will only be briefly discussed. Similar to the work of Hong and Tantillo, we modeled the transformation A → I.…”
Section: ■ Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The gas phase is a natural choice as a reference environment for terpene synthases, 16 as this reflects the inherent reactivity of the reacting species, although organic solvents may also be used. 16,56,59 The current gas-phase free energy profile is similar to that obtained by Sato et al 47 and Hong and Tantillo 46 and will only be briefly discussed. Similar to the work of Hong and Tantillo, we modeled the transformation A → I.…”
Section: ■ Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…66,67 A combined quantum mechanics-molecular mechanics (QM/MM) potential was employed, in order to model the multistep cascade to form cyclooctat-9-en-7-ol (Scheme 1). 68−70 Similarly to our previous studies, 16,18 the QM region in CotB2 includes the substrate hydrocarbon framework, as well as the metal−pyrophosphate cluster PP−(Mg 2+ ) 3 , while the remaining enzyme−solvent system is represented by the CHARMM36 MM force field. 71,72 The QM region is described using the M06-2X functional, 52 with a mixed basis set (H, C, P: 6-31G(d); O: 6-31+G(d); Mg: STO-3G).…”
Section: ■ Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The product selectivity of (sesqui-) TPSs varies significantly within this versatile enzyme family ranging from single product formation (e.g., (+)-δ-cadinene synthase from Gossypium arboreum ) to a product portfolio of over 50 different compounds (e.g., γ-humulene synthase from Abies grandis ) [ 19 , 25 , 26 ]. In contrast to the common function of an enzyme as an accelerator of a reaction rate, the catalytic challenge for TPSs rather lies in the control of the highly reactive carbocation intermediates alongside their reaction trajectory [ 27 ]. The product distribution in TPSs is guided by several factors such as: (i) the activation of the C–O bond by the pyrophosphate-Mg 2+ -cluster in the active site, (ii) electrostatic interactions that lead to the sequestration of the active site, (iii) the specific positioning of water molecules or acidic/basic residues, that facilitate site-specific hydroxylations or (de)protonations, and (iv) a specific active site architecture that pre-shapes the carbocation intermediate [ 11 , 27 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the common function of an enzyme as an accelerator of a reaction rate, the catalytic challenge for TPSs rather lies in the control of the highly reactive carbocation intermediates alongside their reaction trajectory [ 27 ]. The product distribution in TPSs is guided by several factors such as: (i) the activation of the C–O bond by the pyrophosphate-Mg 2+ -cluster in the active site, (ii) electrostatic interactions that lead to the sequestration of the active site, (iii) the specific positioning of water molecules or acidic/basic residues, that facilitate site-specific hydroxylations or (de)protonations, and (iv) a specific active site architecture that pre-shapes the carbocation intermediate [ 11 , 27 ]. For instance, for two fungal sesquiterpene synthases, Cop4 and Cop6 from Coprinus cinereus , it was demonstrated that a smaller carbocation binding pocket lead to a more specific product profile as the carbocation intermediate is more restricted along its potential cyclization routes [ 28 , 29 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… How are the carbocation intermediates controlled in the catalytic pocket of sesterTPSs to produce different final products, thereby contributing to plant sesterterpene diversity? Computationally guided methods such as quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical molecular dynamics simulations have been employed to study the product distribution controlled by TPSs ( Sato et al., 2018 ; Raz et al., 2020 ). Together with the available AtTPS18 structure, multiscale simulations of sesterTPS will help us to engineer sesterTPS activity more rationally.…”
Section: Concluding Remarks and Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%