2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2014.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enzalutamide After Docetaxel and Abiraterone Acetate Treatment in Prostate Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of 10 Case Series

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 23 , 24 , 26 , 28 Similar poor results with enzalutamide were described in a pooled analysis of ten retrospective case series of 536 patients treated with enzalutamide following progression on docetaxel and abiraterone. 31 Overall, the pooled PSA response rate ≥50% was 22.9% (95% CI: 19.3–27.1) in the whole group, 26%–34% among abiraterone responders, and 13%–20% among abiraterone-refractory patients. Median PFS was 3.1 months (range 1.4–4.9), and median OS was 8.3 months (range 2.85–10.6).…”
Section: Safety and Efficacy Studiesmentioning
confidence: 89%
“… 23 , 24 , 26 , 28 Similar poor results with enzalutamide were described in a pooled analysis of ten retrospective case series of 536 patients treated with enzalutamide following progression on docetaxel and abiraterone. 31 Overall, the pooled PSA response rate ≥50% was 22.9% (95% CI: 19.3–27.1) in the whole group, 26%–34% among abiraterone responders, and 13%–20% among abiraterone-refractory patients. Median PFS was 3.1 months (range 1.4–4.9), and median OS was 8.3 months (range 2.85–10.6).…”
Section: Safety and Efficacy Studiesmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…There is also some evidence from a number of small retrospective cohort studies suggesting limited activity of these agents when used in a sequential fashion either before or after docetaxel chemotherapy in advanced CRPC [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. Development of predictive biomarkers to facilitate the selection of patients for a specific therapy or sequence of therapies is the focus of ongoing efforts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trials of abiraterone and enzalutamide excluded patients treated with the other novel AR pathway inhibitor, and abiraterone and enzalutamide were either not available or only available as part of clinical trials when the trials of docetaxel, sipuleucel-T, radium-223 and cabazitaxel were conducted. Evidence from a number of small retrospective cohort studies suggests limited activity from whichever of abiraterone and enzalutamide are used second in a sequential fashion [49][50][51][52][53]. Docetaxel after one or both of newer AR pathway inhibitors may have less activity than in the pivotal trials [54][55][56].…”
Section: Treatment Choice and Sequencing For Men With Metastatic Crpcmentioning
confidence: 99%