Environmentally Sustainable Food Consumption: A Review and Research Agenda From a Goal-Directed Perspective

Abstract

The challenge of convincing people to change their eating habits toward more environmentally sustainable food consumption (ESFC) patterns is becoming increasingly pressing. Food preferences, choices and eating habits are notoriously hard to change as they are a central aspect of people's lifestyles and their socio-cultural environment. Many people already hold positive attitudes toward sustainable food, but the notable gap between favorable attitudes and actual purchase and consumption of more sustainable food products remains to be bridged. The current work aims to (1) present a comprehensive theoretical framework for future research on ESFC, and (2) highlight behavioral solutions for environmental challenges in the food domain from an interdisciplinary perspective. First, starting from the premise that food consumption is deliberately or unintentionally directed at attaining goals, a goal-directed framework for understanding and influencing ESFC is built. To engage in goal-directed behavior, people typically go through a series of sequential steps. The proposed theoretical framework makes explicit the sequential steps or hurdles that need to be taken for consumers to engage in ESFC. Consumers need to positively value the environment, discern a discrepancy between the desired versus the actual state of the environment, opt for action to reduce the experienced discrepancy, intend to engage in behavior that is expected to bring them closer to the desired end state, and act in accordance with their intention. Second, a critical review of the literature on mechanisms that underlie and explain ESFC (or the lack thereof) in high-income countries is presented and integrated into the goal-directed framework. This contribution thus combines a topdown conceptualization with a bottom-up literature review; it identifies and discusses factors that might hold people back from ESFC and interventions that might promote ESFC; and it reveals knowledge gaps as well as insights on how to encourage

Consumer Education and Food Waste: An Example of the Bakery Market - the Case of Young Consumer

“…Food preferences, dietary choices and habits are extremely difficult to change as they are at the heart of people's lifestyle and their socio-cultural environment. Many people already have a positive attitude towards sustainable food, but the noticeable gap between being positive and real purchasing and sustainable consumption behaviours remain to be covered (Vermeir et al, 2020). Food waste is a complex problem that requires a broad approach to analysing several factors simultaneously.…”

From Cashews to Nudges: The Evolution of Behavioral Economics

“…One possibility that Johnson and I considered was that people would edit events to make themselves as happy as possible, a hypothesis we called hedonic editing. In the example, since the value function is concave for gains, 5 The same thinking applies to security purchases. Investors tend to sell winners more quickly than losers, although there are (at least in the United States) tax benefits to selling the losers.…”

“…This helps explain why someone can think that going to the event is a good idea-it eliminates the need to declare the original purchase as a loss. 5 It can also offer some insights into gigantic examples of the sunk-cost fallacy exhibited by governments. When I was thinking about these issues, the United States government's continued involvement in the Vietnam war seemed best explained in these terms.…”

Influencing Factors of a Sustainable Vegetable Choice. The Romanian Consumers’ Case

“…The common recommendation for the European area includes aspects that transcend the health rationale. The "fresh" and "local" adjectives describing the fruits and vegetables are sustainability aspects [22,28,82,91] elegantly inserted in the European consumers' vocabulary.…”

“…Even if it is hard to provide a commonly agreed definition [31], sustainable food choice refers, in short, to choosing the product that best fits a consumers' needs, based on available regional or local resources and liking, taking also into consideration the social and environmental responsibilities and characteristics of the community [74,81,91,99]. Source: authors' own abstracting after USDA [15], WHO [16], Australian Government [17], WHO [18], Indian National Institute of Nutrition [19] and Canadian Government [20].…”