2009
DOI: 10.1890/09-1063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmentally sensitive life-cycle traits have low elasticity: implications for theory and practice.

Abstract: Abstract. The relationships between population growth rate and the life-cycle traits contributing to it are nonlinear and variable. This has made it difficult for ecologists to consistently predict changes in population dynamics from observations on changes in life-cycle traits. We show that traits having a high sensitivity to chemical toxicants tend to have a low elasticity, meaning that changes in them have a relatively low impact on population growth rate, compared to other life-cycle traits. This makes evo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to life history theory, environmental stressors should have the strongest effects on life history traits with the lowest sensitivity, e.g., traits with the lowest importance for population growth (, Forbes et al 2010). In long‐lived species, adult survival rate has the highest elasticity and should be the least affected by environmental stressors, whereas breeding success has the lowest elasticity and should be the most sensitive to stressors (, ), including toxic chemicals (Forbes et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to life history theory, environmental stressors should have the strongest effects on life history traits with the lowest sensitivity, e.g., traits with the lowest importance for population growth (, Forbes et al 2010). In long‐lived species, adult survival rate has the highest elasticity and should be the least affected by environmental stressors, whereas breeding success has the lowest elasticity and should be the most sensitive to stressors (, ), including toxic chemicals (Forbes et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because elasticity values calculated from the REF population showed that survival to year 2 juveniles had relatively low elasticity (Fig. 3b, first two columns), changes in this stage (or age) would perhaps not be expected to translate to statistically significant effects on PGR (Pfister, 1998;Forbes et al, 2010). The significant reduction in PGR we observed from our model therefore indicates that the effects observed on juveniles exposed to PCBs were sufficient to manifest as a potential effect on population-level endpoints.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Meantime, the variability in population growth rate had been thought to have negative consequences for fitness during the process of nature selection (Forbes et al, 2010). Therefore, TCS at the concentration higher than 1 µg/L released into water body should raise concern due to its significant influence on rotifer population growth rate.…”
Section: Reproductive Bioassaysmentioning
confidence: 99%