Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.jes.2022.08.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmentally persistent free radicals in PM2.5 from a typical Chinese industrial city during COVID-19 lockdown: The unexpected contamination level variation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides overall air quality, the effects of the lockdown on various pollutants' concentrations and its sources (such as black carbon and aerosol), and greenhouse gases (such as CO 2 ) have also been estimated in previous studies most of which have detected reductions in their concentrations or emissions during lockdown periods in different countries and non-same lockdowns ( Kalisa and Adams, 2022 ; Liu et al, 2022 ; Zeng and Wang, 2022 ; Lu et al, 2021; Naqvi et al, 2021 ; Shen et al, 2021 ; Srivastava et al, 2021 ; Bao and Zhang, 2020 ; He et al, 2020; Le Quéré et al, 2020 ; Mahato et al, 2020 ; Silver et al, 2020 ; Xu et al, 2020). There are, however, some studies that show that the lockdown did not seem to significantly prevent air pollution, especially caused by nonsignificant-changing SO 2 ( Song et al, 2021 ) and PM 2.5 ( Wang et al, 2024 ; Chen et al, 2021 ), and rising O 3 (Mamtimin et al, 2022; Shen et al, 2021 ; Wang et al, 2021b ). For example, O 3 concentrations increased during the lockdown by 116%, 145% and 37.42% in Wuhan ( Lian et al, 2020 ), Hangzhou ( Wang et al, 2020 ) and Ji'nan ( Li et al, 2022 ) city of China, and by 20–30% in Indian Indo Gangetic plain at night ( Singh et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides overall air quality, the effects of the lockdown on various pollutants' concentrations and its sources (such as black carbon and aerosol), and greenhouse gases (such as CO 2 ) have also been estimated in previous studies most of which have detected reductions in their concentrations or emissions during lockdown periods in different countries and non-same lockdowns ( Kalisa and Adams, 2022 ; Liu et al, 2022 ; Zeng and Wang, 2022 ; Lu et al, 2021; Naqvi et al, 2021 ; Shen et al, 2021 ; Srivastava et al, 2021 ; Bao and Zhang, 2020 ; He et al, 2020; Le Quéré et al, 2020 ; Mahato et al, 2020 ; Silver et al, 2020 ; Xu et al, 2020). There are, however, some studies that show that the lockdown did not seem to significantly prevent air pollution, especially caused by nonsignificant-changing SO 2 ( Song et al, 2021 ) and PM 2.5 ( Wang et al, 2024 ; Chen et al, 2021 ), and rising O 3 (Mamtimin et al, 2022; Shen et al, 2021 ; Wang et al, 2021b ). For example, O 3 concentrations increased during the lockdown by 116%, 145% and 37.42% in Wuhan ( Lian et al, 2020 ), Hangzhou ( Wang et al, 2020 ) and Ji'nan ( Li et al, 2022 ) city of China, and by 20–30% in Indian Indo Gangetic plain at night ( Singh et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al, 2020a;Mo et al, 2021;Song et al, 2021;Luo et al, 2022;Q. Ma et al, 2023;L. Wang et al, 2024).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Several studies have also found non-significant changes or even increases in SO 2 and PM 2.5 accompanied by severe haze events (Z. Chen et al, 2021;Mo et al, 2021;Song et al, 2021;L. Wang et al, 2024).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%