This article explores the potential contributions of a model of meaning making (Park 2010a) to the emerging study of implicit religion. A model of meaning making is first explicated; this model describes the ways in which meaning is central to human beings in both their everyday lives and in stressful circumstances and delineates global and situational levels of meaning. Previous applications of the meaning making model to religiousness/spirituality are discussed. The concept of implicit religion is introduced, and implications of its integration into a broader religious meaning-making model are considered. Suggestions for future research on implicit religion and meaning-making conclude the article.
The meaning making modelThe meaning making model proposed by Park and colleagues (Park 2010a; Park and Folkman 1997) was developed to bring together an accumulating literature on multiple related but distinct topics, including meaning in life, spirituality, worldviews, and coping with difficult experiences such as trauma, bereavement, and physical illness. Collectively, this literature suggests that meaning is central to and pervasive in human experience and, through multiple pathways, affects psychological, physical and social well-being (Park 2010b). This section briefly reviews the meaning making model; a more detailed treatment is provided hy Park ( ,2010a. The meaning making model describes two levels of meaning, global and situational. Global meaning refers to individuals' general orienting systems (Pargament 1997). Situational meaning refers to the influence of global meaning in the context of particular situations. Meaning systems