Environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure and firm performance: does national culture matter?

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to analyze the extent to which culture may affect the relationship between environmental, social and governance disclosure (ESGD) and firm performance (FP). Design/methodology/approach Data for testing the hypotheses are collected from 668 firms in the energy sector worldwide over a period of eight years from 2009 to 2016. The analysis is carried out using the instrumental variables regression technique to account for endogeneity. Hofstede’s cultural dimensions of power distance (PD), masculinity (MASC), long-term orientation (LTO), uncertainty avoidance (UNCAVOID) and individualism (INDV) are used as proxies for culture. Findings The results show that ESGD has a significant negative impact on the profitability of energy firms. When cultural dimensions are taken into account, PD and LTO are found to significantly moderate the relationship between ESGD and FP, whereas MASC, UNCAVOID and INDV have no significant effect on the relationship between ESGD and FP. Practical implications The findings of this study highlight the need for regulators to consider the importance of cultural dimensions when seeking to develop a single global standard for ESGD. In addition, regulators need to weigh both the costs and benefits of developing a global standard for it to be effective and acceptable. Social implications This study emphasizes the need to take into account the cultural orientation of the society in which firms operate when devising strategies to fulfill societal expectations and achieve business goals. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study that addresses the role of culture in affecting the impact of ESGD on FP.

The Influence of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Practices on US Firms’ Performance: Evidence from the Coronavirus Crisis

“…The outcomes show a positive influence on FP. Wasiuzzaman et al (2022) analyze the connection between ESG practices and FP by employing a sample of 668 corporations in the energy sector from 2009 to 2016. These outcomes show a negative influence on FP.…”

Over-investment and ESG inequality

“…One of the most prominent theories on which the CSR literature is based is the legitimacy theory; other important theories include the agency theory, stakeholder theory and signaling theory (Kuzey and Uyar, 2017; Gerged et al , 2020; Gerged et al , 2021; Wasiuzzaman et al , 2022a). Initially propagated by Salancik and Pfeffer (1978), the legitimacy theory posits that companies must gain legitimacy – that is, a “license to operate” and acceptance by society – to obtain essential resources needed to perform operations for which environmental and social engagement are the means (Deegan, 2002).…”

Board gender diversity and environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure: Is it different for developed and developing nations?

“…Interestingly however, the sector has been instrumental in generating interest in social and environmental reporting due to the occurrence of major environmental disasters as a result of the activities of the energy sector. It is also found to be the most active in providing some form of sustainability report, with greater focus given to environmental disclosures (Wasiuzzaman et al, 2022). With regards to gender issues, women have a very small presence in the energy sector.…”