2008
DOI: 10.1002/smj.678
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental risk management and the cost of capital

Abstract: Our study of 267 U.S. firms shows that improved environmental risk management is associated with a lower cost of capital. Our findings provide an alternative perspective on the environmental‐economic performance relationship, which has been dominated by the view that improvements in economic performance stem from better resource utilization. Firms also benefit from improved environmental risk management through a reduction in their cost of equity capital, a shift from equity to debt financing, and higher tax b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

33
704
2
12

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,117 publications
(806 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
33
704
2
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Since pollution levels are increasingly critical, any environmental incident may tarnish a firm's reputation in addition to subjecting it to substantial legal costs and fines (Eiadat et al 2008) which can have significant impacts on financial performance. As a firm makes strategic investments that reduce emissions and pollution, it mitigates its risk of litigation (Sharfman and Fernando 2008). All these additional benefits could indicate that improved EP could provide more than proportional improvement in FP in the long term, establishing the existence of curvilinear positive impacts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since pollution levels are increasingly critical, any environmental incident may tarnish a firm's reputation in addition to subjecting it to substantial legal costs and fines (Eiadat et al 2008) which can have significant impacts on financial performance. As a firm makes strategic investments that reduce emissions and pollution, it mitigates its risk of litigation (Sharfman and Fernando 2008). All these additional benefits could indicate that improved EP could provide more than proportional improvement in FP in the long term, establishing the existence of curvilinear positive impacts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investments in EP (e.g., waste reduction) can yield positive returns in terms of FP initially, but it will be encouraging for managers that accumulated expertise on existing environmental investments could lead to more accelerated improvements in FP. It can provide insurance against litigations (Sharfman and Fernando 2008). Such proactive investments in improving EP can also be useful to managers to meet the obligations of environmental regulations and even stay ahead of the regulations (Porter and Linde 1995).…”
Section: Theoretical and Managerial Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research stream implicates the risk-management approach, emphasizing that a firm's involvement in innovation and environmental sustainability positively impacts its values [26,27], resulting in null or negative trade-off costs. Accordingly, the "negative" trade-off costs would be basic motivation for firms to partake in activities relevant to both innovation and sustainability issues.…”
Section: Eco-innovation Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate the environmental performance, we chose the KLD dataset because it has been popularly used by CSR researchers [1,2,5,27,36,37]. We started sampling with the firms from the KLD database by identifying all large U.S. public firms whose environmental performances were evaluated by KLD.…”
Section: Sample and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature on the effects of corporate sustainability on firm value has become extensive in recent years (e. g., Dowell et al, 2000;Godfrey, 2005;Godfrey et al, 2009;Sharfman and Fernando, 2008). However, the lines of argument that can be found are similar: If it is assumed that management acts rationally and mainly on the behalf of shareholders, introducing corporate sustainability is either supposed to enhance expected cash flows, reduce investment risk, or both.…”
Section: The Effect Of Corporate Sustainability On the Market Value Omentioning
confidence: 99%