2010
DOI: 10.1002/ieam.96
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental risk assessment of ivermectin: A case study

Abstract: The veterinary parasiticide ivermectin was selected as a case study compound within the project ERAPharm (Environmental Risk Assessment of Pharmaceuticals). Based on experimental data generated within ERAPharm and additional literature data, an environmental risk assessment (ERA) was performed mainly according to international and European guidelines. For the environmental compartments surface water, sediment, and dung, a risk was indicated at all levels of the tiered assessment approach. Only for soil was no … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
86
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

6
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
(118 reference statements)
3
86
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on good experiences in tests with pesticides (Förster et al 2006;Knacker et al 2004) the Terrestrial Model Ecosystem (TME) method was selected for studying the effects of ivermectin on structural (abundance and species composition of soil organisms) and functional (bait-lamina test) endpoints. While there are many ecotoxicological data available for this compound regarding single species tests (for review see Liebig et al 2010), it has never been tested in a comparable semi-field test so far.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Based on good experiences in tests with pesticides (Förster et al 2006;Knacker et al 2004) the Terrestrial Model Ecosystem (TME) method was selected for studying the effects of ivermectin on structural (abundance and species composition of soil organisms) and functional (bait-lamina test) endpoints. While there are many ecotoxicological data available for this compound regarding single species tests (for review see Liebig et al 2010), it has never been tested in a comparable semi-field test so far.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A considerable amount of work within the project focused on 3 case studies; 2 focused on human pharmaceuticals, the b-blocker atenolol (Kü ster et al 2010) and the antidepressant fluoxetine (Oakes et al 2010), and the third on a veterinary parasiticide, ivermectin (Liebig et al 2010). For these 3 compounds, environmental risk assessments were performed to evaluate and highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the existing European guidelines on environmental risk assessment of pharmaceuticals.…”
Section: Key Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ecotoxicological data, published either in the peer-reviewed literature or in ecotoxicological databases (ECE TOX in EU; ECOTOX in USA) (EU 2001 ;Jones et al 2002 ;Sanderson et al 2003 ;Stuer-Lauridsen et al 2000 ) , are currently available for <10% of the currently prescribed pharmaceuticals. It is also disconcerting that only a few pharmaceuticals have been subjected to ecological risk assessments (Henschel et al 1997 ;Emblidge and DeLorenzo 2006 ;Hernando et al 2006 ;Küster et al 2010 ;Oakes et al 2010 ;Liebig et al 2010 ). Furthermore, the majority of aquatic toxicity studies performed on pharmaceuticals address the effects of individual-substance exposures in laboratory waters (or a few with sediments), rather than effl uent matrices that refl ect how pharmaceuticals are typically discharged to surface waters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%