1998
DOI: 10.5558/tfc74203-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental release of transgenic trees in Canada — potential benefits and assessment of biosafety

Abstract: potential benefits and assessment of biosafety by T. J. Mullinl and S. ~e r t r a n d~The release of new genetic materials into forest ecosystems, La dkploiement de tout mat6riel gknktique nouveau dans les tkosysregardless of the method used to develop them, should be done t5mes forestiers doit se faire d'une manibre skcuritaire et responin an environmentally responsible manner. Canada is participating sable, et ce peu importe la mCthodologie utilisCe pour I'obtenir. with the OECD in efforts to harmonize regul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(64 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the engagement of academic and government scientists with industries wishing to commercialize transgenic trees is likely to be essential to convince a wary public that scientific assessments and plantation monitoring programs have been conducted responsibly (James et al 1998;Mullin and Bertrand 1998). Another significant hurdle for use of transgenic technology in forestry is the intellectual property right that dominates the biotechnology sector (Lucier et al 2001).…”
Section: Limitations and Changes Of Technologies In Relation To Genetmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the engagement of academic and government scientists with industries wishing to commercialize transgenic trees is likely to be essential to convince a wary public that scientific assessments and plantation monitoring programs have been conducted responsibly (James et al 1998;Mullin and Bertrand 1998). Another significant hurdle for use of transgenic technology in forestry is the intellectual property right that dominates the biotechnology sector (Lucier et al 2001).…”
Section: Limitations and Changes Of Technologies In Relation To Genetmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Transgenic super trees possess all the characteristics of a good weed and risk becoming invasives, and very fast growing, nutrient-demanding plantations operated on short rotations could drive inappropriate plantation development. Many in the forestry industry, as well as academic researchers, are interested in genetically engineering trees but are proceeding cautiously as they evaluate the technology's environmental consequences and gauge how consumers will react to products made from genetically modified trees (Rogers and Parkes 1995;Mullin and Bertrand 1998;Fenning and Gershenzon 2002).…”
Section: Problems Of Regulations and Public Acceptancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…( MULLIN and BERTRAND, 1998). However, in addition to these concerns, the special purposes for which these trees are genetically modified will almost certainly have effects on their eventual deployment and acceptance by the general public.…”
Section: Ethical and Social Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Escape of herbicidetolerant trees could lead to reduced control options for other growers, and may force them to rely on less effective or less environmentally benign herbicides for poplar control. Transgenic sterility is likely to dramatically reduce the problem, both quantitatively and spatially, though is unlikely to provide perfect containment in the immediate future (Mullin and Bertrand 1998).…”
Section: Herbicide Tolerancementioning
confidence: 99%