2014
DOI: 10.1039/c4en00149d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental release, fate and ecotoxicological effects of manufactured ceria nanomaterials

Abstract: uses. This has led to a number of publications on the toxicological effects of nanoceria in ecological receptor species, but only limited information is available on possible environmental releases, concentrations in environmental media, or environmental transformations. Increasing material flows of nanoceria in many applications is likely to result in increasing releases to air, water and soils however; insufficient information was available to estimate aquatic exposures that would result in acute or chronic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
93
2
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
(210 reference statements)
5
93
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A comparison of long-term concentrations in freshwater environments with predicted hazardous concentrations at which 5% of species in a freshwater ecosystem will be harmed (HC 5 ) indicates that even under the highest release scenario considered in this study CeO 2 will likely be well below the NOEC and the lowest observed effect concentration (LOEC) (Figures 4 and S22A). 133 Under all release scenarios, CuO does not exceed the NOEC HC 5 ( Figure S22B). The single species NOAEC line (light green line, D. magna) indicates that under the considered scenarios it is still unlikely that toxic effects would be observed in freshwater except in the highest release scenario considered ( Figure S22B).…”
Section: ■ Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison of long-term concentrations in freshwater environments with predicted hazardous concentrations at which 5% of species in a freshwater ecosystem will be harmed (HC 5 ) indicates that even under the highest release scenario considered in this study CeO 2 will likely be well below the NOEC and the lowest observed effect concentration (LOEC) (Figures 4 and S22A). 133 Under all release scenarios, CuO does not exceed the NOEC HC 5 ( Figure S22B). The single species NOAEC line (light green line, D. magna) indicates that under the considered scenarios it is still unlikely that toxic effects would be observed in freshwater except in the highest release scenario considered ( Figure S22B).…”
Section: ■ Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metal concentrations for all three ENMs are reported as ionic, although neither CeO 2 nor TiO 2 were expected to dissolve to a significant degree under the conditions used in this experiment. TiO 2 is known to be highly insoluble in water and CeO 2 is similarly insoluble at pH similar to those found in the soils used here (Collin et al, 2014). However, Cu(OH) 2 has been shown to undergo partial dissolution under acidic to neutral conditions, although at acidic pH less dissolution occurs in media with high concentrations of dissolved organic matter (Adeleye et al, 2014;Conway et al, 2015).…”
Section: Enm Transport Through Unsaturated Soilmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Additionally, since TiO 2 and CeO 2 are photoactive and produce ROS when exposed to light, 26,27 we predicted that they would have the greatest effect in plants grown under high illumination by interfering with photosynthesis in leaves.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%